Engels H, Wambersie A
Department of Radiation Protection, Studiecentrum voor Kernergie (SCK/CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;150:54-87. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78774-4_3.
The risk of secondary cancer induction after a therapeutic irradiation with conventional photon beams is well recognised and documented. However, in general, it is totally overwhelmed by the benefit of the treatment. The same is true to a large extent for the combinations of radiation and drug therapy. After fast neutron therapy, the risk of secondary cancer induction is greater than after photon therapy. This can be expected from the whole set of radiobiological data, accumulated so far, which shows systematically a greater relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for neutrons for all the biological systems which have been investigated. Furthermore, the neutron RBE increases with decreasing dose and there is extensive evidence that neutron RBE is greater for cancer induction and for other late effects relevant in radiation protection than for cell killing at high doses as used in therapy. Almost no reliable human epidemiological data are available so far, and the aim of this work is to derive the best risks estimate for cancer induction after neutron irradiation and in particular fast neutron therapy. Animal data on RBE for tumour induction are analysed. In addition, other biological effects are reviewed, such as life shortening, malignant cell transformation in vitro, chromosome aberrations, genetic effects. These effects can be related, directly or indirectly, to cancer induction to the extent that they express a "genomic" lesion. Since neutron RBE depends on the energy spectrum, the radiation quality has to be carefully specified. Therefore, the microdosimetric spectra are reported each time they are available. Lastly, since heavy-ion beam therapy is being developed at several centres worldwide, the available data on RBE at low doses are reviewed. It can be concluded from this review that the risk of induction of a secondary cancer after fast neutron therapy should not be greater than 10-20 times the risk after photon beam therapy. For heavy ions, and in particular for carbon ions, the risk estimate should be divided by a factor of about 3 due to the reduced integral dose. The risk has to be balanced against the expected improvement in cure rate when the indication for high-LET therapy has been correctly evaluated in well-selected patient groups.
采用传统光子束进行治疗性照射后诱发继发性癌症的风险已得到充分认识并有文献记载。然而,总体而言,这种风险与治疗带来的益处相比微不足道。在很大程度上,放射治疗与药物治疗联合使用时情况也是如此。快中子治疗后诱发继发性癌症的风险高于光子治疗。从目前积累的所有放射生物学数据来看,这是可以预料的,这些数据系统地表明,对于所有已研究的生物系统,中子的相对生物效应(RBE)更大。此外,中子的RBE随剂量降低而增加,并且有大量证据表明,与治疗中使用的高剂量下的细胞杀伤相比,中子在诱发癌症和其他与辐射防护相关的晚期效应方面的RBE更大。目前几乎没有可靠的人类流行病学数据,这项工作的目的是得出中子照射尤其是快中子治疗后诱发癌症的最佳风险估计值。分析了关于肿瘤诱发的RBE的动物数据。此外,还综述了其他生物学效应,如寿命缩短、体外恶性细胞转化、染色体畸变、遗传效应。这些效应在表达“基因组”损伤的程度上,可以直接或间接地与癌症诱发相关。由于中子RBE取决于能谱,因此必须仔细规定辐射质量。因此,每次有微剂量谱时都会报告。最后,由于全球多个中心正在开展重离子束治疗,因此综述了低剂量下RBE的现有数据。从这次综述可以得出结论,快中子治疗后诱发继发性癌症的风险不应大于光子束治疗后风险的10至20倍。对于重离子,特别是碳离子,由于积分剂量降低,风险估计值应除以约3的系数。当在精心挑选的患者群体中正确评估了高LET治疗的适应症时,必须将风险与预期的治愈率提高进行权衡。