• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK.

作者信息

McAfee P C, Regan J J, Geis W P, Fedder I L

机构信息

Scoliosis and Spine Center, St. Josephs Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jul 1;23(13):1476-84. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199807010-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199807010-00009
PMID:9670400
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Eighteen patients with lumbar instability from fractures, postlaminectomy syndrome, or infection were treated prospectively with minimally invasive retroperitoneal lumbar fusions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if interbody Bagby and Kuslich fusion cages and femoral allograft bone dowels can be inserted in a transverse direction via a lateral endoscopic retroperitoneal approach to achieve spinal stability.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Endoscopic spinal approaches have been used to achieve lower lumbar fusion when instrumentation is placed through a laparoscopic, transperitoneal route. However, complications of using this approach include postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions, retrograde ejaculation, great vessel injury, and implant migration. This study is the first clinical series investigating the use of the lateral retroperitoneal minimally invasive approach for lumbar fusions from L1 to L5.

METHODS

Eighteen patients underwent anterior interbody decompression and/or stabilization via endoscopic retroperitoneal approaches. In most cases, three 12-mm portals were used. Two parallel transverse interbody cages restored the neuroforaminal height and the desired amount of lumbar lordosis was achieved by inserting a larger anterior cage, distraction plug, or bone dowel.

RESULTS

The overall morbidity of the procedure was lower than that associated with traditional "open" retroperitoneal or laparotomy techniques, with a mean length of hospital stay of 2.9 days (range, outpatient procedure to 5 days). The mean estimated intraoperative blood loss was 205 cc (range, 25-1000 cc). There were no cases of implant migration, significant subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis at mean follow-up examination of 24.3 months (range, 12-40 months) after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study of 18 patients illustrates that endoscopic techniques can be applied effectively through a retroperitoneal approach with the patient in the lateral position. Unlike the patients who had undergone transperitoneal procedures described in previous reports, in these preliminary 18 patients, there were no cases of retrograde ejaculation, injury to the great vessels, or implant migration.

摘要

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jul 1;23(13):1476-84. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199807010-00009.
2
An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.一种针对腰椎的开放、微创方法。
Am Surg. 1999 Jan;65(1):61-8.
3
Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.使用BAK椎间融合器经腹腔镜行L4-L5椎间融合术:前58例经验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Oct 15;24(20):2171-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00018.
4
Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine.内镜下经腰大肌外侧入路治疗腰椎疾病
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 1;29(15):1681-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000133643.75795.ef.
5
Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery: a comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients.电视辅助与开放前路腰椎融合手术:135例患者四种技术及并发症的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 1;28(7):729-32. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051912.04345.96.
6
Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器在微创侧方经腹膜外经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的沉降。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):1268-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f.
7
Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless (BERG) technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).用于前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)的球囊辅助内镜下腹膜后无气(BERG)技术。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):268-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8827-5. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
8
Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.前路腰椎椎间融合术后逆行射精:经腹与经腹膜后入路对比
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 15;28(10):1023-6. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000062965.47779.EB.
9
A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.一种用于微创前路腰椎椎间融合术的新显微外科技术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Mar 15;22(6):691-9; discussion 700. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023.
10
A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.L4-L5前路融合术手术方式的前瞻性比较:腹腔镜手术与微创前路腰椎椎间融合术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2682-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00023.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and future directions.微创腹腔镜和机器人辅助前路腰椎椎间融合术:系统评价与未来方向
BMC Surg. 2025 May 21;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02890-0.
2
Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.腰椎侧方和斜向椎间融合术的比较性综述:技术、结果及并发症
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 May 12;19(2):246-260. doi: 10.14444/8759.
3
Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Posterolateral Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
内镜下后外侧椎间融合术与外侧椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 May;17(5):1287-1297. doi: 10.1111/os.14371. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.梨形椎间盘作为经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后硬化性Modic改变的危险因素
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1111/os.14350. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
5
Predictors and tactics for revision surgery in lateral lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎侧路椎间融合术翻修手术的预测因素和策略。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 17;23(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06052-8.
6
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中使用 n-HA/PA66 cage 与 PEEK cage 的长期疗效比较:一项配对病例对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):152-161. doi: 10.1111/os.13593. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal debridement for lumbar septic spondylodiscitis: A two-case report.达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜下腰椎化脓性脊椎间盘炎清创术:两例报告
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 7;9:930536. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.930536. eCollection 2022.
8
Creation of a Proof-of-Concept 3D-Printed Spinal Lateral Access Simulator.创建一个概念验证的3D打印脊柱侧方入路模拟器。
Cureus. 2022 May 29;14(5):e25448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25448. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Role of Lateral Fusion in Deformity Surgery.外侧融合在畸形手术中的作用。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Mar;16(S1):S33-S43. doi: 10.14444/8234.
10
Predictors for second-stage posterior direct decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of five hundred fifty-seven patients in the past five years.五年间 557 例患者的侧路腰椎间融合术后二期后路直接减压的预测因素分析。
Int Orthop. 2022 May;46(5):1101-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05313-4. Epub 2022 Feb 7.