Moed B R, Watson J T, Cramer K E, Karges D E, Teefey J S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jun-Jul;12(5):334-42. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199806000-00007.
To evaluate the efficacy of unreamed retrograde intramedullary (IM) nailing of fractures of the femoral shaft in a second series of patients using modifications suggested from our initial study.
Prospective.
Level I trauma center.
Based on the findings of a previous study, we began a clinical series incorporating changes consisting of (a) inclusion of any patient with a femoral shaft fracture amenable to IM nailing (i.e., closed physes), (b) primary use of a split patellar tendon intercondylar distal femoral entry portal, and (c) the use of a full-length femoral implant having variable size availability and dynamization capability. Over a twelve-month period, thirty-four patients with thirty-five femoral shaft fractures were treated. The protocol called for planned dynamization in statically locked stable fractures and unstable fractures showing minimal healing at six to twelve weeks. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Knee Society clinical rating system.
Incorporating the concepts of canal fill and early dynamization, there were only two nonunions (6 percent) in this series as compared with 14 percent in the previously reported series with an overall shorter time to union (12.6 versus 15 weeks). There were no infections or malunions. Postoperative complaints of knee pain were minimal (knee score average: 98 points) and knee function was excellent (knee score average: 97 points).
Although not advocated as a replacement for other techniques, unreamed retrograde nailing is presented as a safe and beneficial fracture fixation method that should be added to the orthopaedic surgeon's treatment armamentarium. The operative technique is quick and simple, and blood loss is minimal. Early nail dynamization and early weight-bearing are important in minimizing the risk of nonunion.
运用我们初步研究中提出的改进方法,评估在第二组患者中使用非扩髓逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折的疗效。
前瞻性研究。
一级创伤中心。
基于先前研究的结果,我们开展了一项临床系列研究,纳入了以下改变:(a)纳入任何适合髓内钉治疗的股骨干骨折患者(即闭合骨骺);(b)首选劈开髌腱经股骨髁间远端入路;(c)使用具有多种尺寸且可动力化的全长股骨植入物。在十二个月的时间里,治疗了34例患者的35个股骨干骨折。该方案要求对静态锁定稳定骨折以及在6至12周时愈合不佳的不稳定骨折进行计划性动力化。通过膝关节协会临床评分系统评估功能结果。
结合髓腔填充和早期动力化的概念,本系列中仅有2例骨不连(6%),而先前报道的系列中骨不连发生率为14%,总体愈合时间更短(12.6周对15周)。无感染或畸形愈合。术后膝关节疼痛主诉极少(膝关节评分平均:98分),膝关节功能极佳(膝关节评分平均:97分)。
尽管不提倡将非扩髓逆行髓内钉作为其他技术的替代方法,但它是一种安全有益的骨折固定方法,应纳入骨科医生的治疗手段。手术技术快速简单,失血极少。早期髓内钉动力化和早期负重对于将骨不连风险降至最低很重要。