Suppr超能文献

米氮平:与氟西汀治疗中重度重度抑郁症患者的疗效及耐受性比较。米氮平-氟西汀研究组

Mirtazapine: efficacy and tolerability in comparison with fluoxetine in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Mirtazapine-Fluoxetine Study Group.

作者信息

Wheatley D P, van Moffaert M, Timmerman L, Kremer C M

机构信息

The Royal Masonic Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;59(6):306-12.

PMID:9671343
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients and outpatients.

METHOD

Patients with a major depressive episode (DSM-III-R), a baseline score of > or=21 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and > or=2 on HAM-D Item 1 (depressed mood) were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment with either mirtazapine (N=66, 15-60 mg/day) or fluoxetine (N=67, 20-40 mg/day). The upper limit of the mirtazapine dose range was above the dose range approved in the United States (15-45 mg/day). Efficacy was evaluated by the HAM-D, Clinical Global Impressions, the Visual Analogue Mood Rating Scale (VAMRS), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ). The efficacy analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat group using the last-observation-carried-forward method.

RESULTS

Mean total 17-item HAM-D scores at baseline were 26.0 for the mirtazapine- and 26.1 for the fluoxetine-treated group. The decrease from baseline on the HAM-D was larger in the mirtazapine than in the fluoxetine group throughout the treatment period, reaching statistical significance at days 21 and 28. At assessments from day 21 and onward, the absolute difference between the 2 study groups favoring mirtazapine ranged from 3.7 to 4.2 points, the magnitude of difference usually seen between an efficacious antidepressant drug and placebo. Mean dosages at weeks 1-4 were 36.5 mg/day for mirtazapine and 19.6 mg/day for fluoxetine; the respective dosages at weeks 5-6 were 56.3 mg and 35.8 mg. Similar numbers of patients dropped out due to adverse events; tolerability profiles were comparable except for changes in body weight from baseline which were statistically significantly more pronounced in the mirtazapine group compared to the fluoxetine group.

CONCLUSION

We found that mirtazapine was as well tolerated as fluoxetine and significantly more effective after 3 and 4 weeks of therapy.

摘要

目的

比较米氮平和氟西汀对住院及门诊抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

患有重度抑郁发作(DSM-III-R)、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)基线评分≥21分且HAM-D第1项(抑郁情绪)评分≥2分的患者,被随机分配接受为期6周的米氮平(N = 66,15 - 60毫克/天)或氟西汀(N = 67,20 - 40毫克/天)治疗。米氮平剂量范围的上限高于美国批准的剂量范围(15 - 45毫克/天)。通过HAM-D、临床总体印象、视觉模拟情绪评分量表(VAMRS)以及生活质量享受与满意度问卷(QLESQ)评估疗效。疗效分析采用末次观察结转法对意向性治疗组进行。

结果

米氮平治疗组和氟西汀治疗组基线时17项HAM-D总分均值分别为26.0和26.1。在整个治疗期间,米氮平组HAM-D评分较基线的下降幅度大于氟西汀组,在第21天和第28天达到统计学显著差异。从第21天及以后的评估来看,倾向于米氮平的两个研究组之间的绝对差异在3.7至4.2分之间,这种差异幅度通常见于有效的抗抑郁药物与安慰剂之间。第1 - 4周米氮平的平均剂量为36.5毫克/天,氟西汀为19.6毫克/天;第5 - 6周各自的剂量分别为56.3毫克和35.8毫克。因不良事件退出的患者数量相似;耐受性情况相当,但与氟西汀组相比,米氮平组自基线起体重变化在统计学上更为显著。

结论

我们发现米氮平与氟西汀耐受性相当,且在治疗3至4周后疗效显著更佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验