Greenberg M, Schneider D
Department of Urban Studies and Community Health and New Jersey Graduate Program in Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Jun;102(6-7):542-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102542.
We tested the hypothesis that neighborhoods with hazardous waste sites may no longer be undesirable places to live if they have been at least partly remediated. We collected 377 questionnaires (42% response rate) administered from within one-half mile of the number 1, 4, and 12 hazardous waste sites on the National Priority List (Superfund). These neighborhoods were rated higher quality than neighborhoods with unremediated hazardous waste sites and about the same as neighborhoods in northern New Jersey and the United States as a whole. Newer residents considered these formerly tainted areas to be opportunities to upgrade their housing and living conditions. Long-term residents retained the negative image of the blemished neighborhood.
如果危险废物场地至少得到了部分修复,那么有这些场地的社区可能不再是不宜居住的地方。我们收集了377份问卷(回复率为42%),这些问卷是在国家优先名录(超级基金)上的第1、4和12号危险废物场地半英里范围内发放的。与未修复的危险废物场地所在社区相比,这些社区的质量评级更高,与新泽西州北部及整个美国的社区大致相当。新居民认为这些曾经受污染的地区是改善住房和生活条件的机会。长期居民则保留了对这个有瑕疵社区的负面印象。