Small E J
University of California, San Francisco, UCSF/Mount Zion Cancer Center, USA.
Drugs Aging. 1998 Jul;13(1):71-81. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199813010-00007.
The incidence of prostate carcinoma in the US now appears to be declining slightly, as a consequence of removal of prevalent cases from the population by screening. Screening for serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels has been improved by the use of PSA transformations including PSA density, PSA velocity and age-specific PSA reference ranges. The ratio of free to total PSA may increase the specificity of single serum PSA evaluations without decreasing its sensitivity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Despite the proliferation of risk assessment tools and nomograms, the optimal therapy for localised disease remains controversial, and the usefulness of radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy (either external beam or brachytherapy) has not been tested prospectively against watchful waiting. However, watchful waiting is probably more appropriate for men whose life expectancy is less than 10 to 15 years and/or who have low grade tumours. In patients with metastatic disease, androgen deprivation remains the mainstay of treatment. Whether or not the addition of an antiandrogen prolongs survival remains controversial. Intermittent androgen deprivation appears to be one means of avoiding continuous androgen deprivation and possibly decreasing adverse effects, although its efficacy remains to be proven. For patients whose disease progresses after combined androgen blockade, withdrawal of antiandrogen is now considered mandatory. Tremendous heterogeneity exists among patients who progress after antiandrogen withdrawal, so that patients previously considered resistant to hormones may in fact retain some hormonal sensitivity to second- or third-line hormone therapy. For patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a variety of options exist, including the use of estramustine combinations, suramin, mitoxantrone and doxorubicin combinations. Despite these options, there is presently no standard of care, and clinical trials should receive priority. Palliative interventions, including the use of corticosteroids, radiopharmaceuticals and external beam radiation therapy, should not be overlooked.
由于通过筛查从人群中去除了大量病例,美国前列腺癌的发病率目前似乎正在略有下降。通过使用包括前列腺特异抗原(PSA)密度、PSA速率和年龄特异性PSA参考范围在内的PSA转换方法,血清PSA水平的筛查得到了改进。游离PSA与总PSA的比值可提高单次血清PSA评估的特异性,而不降低其对前列腺癌诊断的敏感性。尽管风险评估工具和列线图不断涌现,但局限性疾病的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议,前列腺癌根治术或放射治疗(外照射或近距离放射治疗)的有效性尚未与观察等待进行前瞻性比较。然而,观察等待可能更适合预期寿命小于10至15年和/或患有低级别肿瘤的男性。对于转移性疾病患者,雄激素剥夺仍然是主要的治疗方法。添加抗雄激素是否能延长生存期仍存在争议。间歇性雄激素剥夺似乎是避免持续雄激素剥夺并可能减少不良反应的一种方法,但其疗效仍有待证实。对于联合雄激素阻断后疾病进展的患者,现在认为必须停用抗雄激素。抗雄激素撤药后进展的患者存在极大的异质性,因此以前被认为对激素耐药的患者实际上可能对二线或三线激素治疗仍保留一些激素敏感性。对于激素难治性前列腺癌患者,有多种选择,包括使用雌莫司汀联合用药、苏拉明、米托蒽醌和多柔比星联合用药。尽管有这些选择,但目前尚无标准的治疗方案,临床试验应优先进行。不应忽视姑息性干预措施,包括使用皮质类固醇、放射性药物和外照射放射治疗。