Udagawa H, Tsurumaru M, Akiyama H
Dept. of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Jul;25(8):1111-7.
The most conspicuous difference between Japan and Western countries in the treatment strategy for esophageal cancer is the attitude to lymph node dissection. Japanese surgeons have aimed at complete eradication of lymphatic spread of cancer cells and have reached the level of three-field lymph node dissection. In Western countries, however, surgeons rely more on chemotherapy or radiotherapy because they consider that most patients who present with esophageal cancer already have disseminated disease. Phase II studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy have yielded encouraging results, and recently, positive reports on phase III studies of neoadjuvant therapy vs. surgery alone began to be announced. No such studies have included surgery with radical lymph node dissection. With the rapid advance in information technology, radical esophagectomy has gradually gained acceptance in the West, while many trials of neoadjuvant therapy have been carried out in Japan. Theoretically, the next step should be a phase III study of neoadjuvant therapy vs. surgery in which highly radical procedures such as three-field lymph node dissection are carried out.
日本与西方国家在食管癌治疗策略上最显著的差异在于对淋巴结清扫的态度。日本外科医生致力于彻底根除癌细胞的淋巴转移,已达到三野淋巴结清扫的水平。然而,在西方国家,外科医生更多地依赖化疗或放疗,因为他们认为大多数食管癌患者就诊时已有播散性疾病。新辅助化疗和放化疗的II期研究已取得令人鼓舞的结果,最近,关于新辅助治疗与单纯手术的III期研究的阳性报告也开始公布。但这些研究均未包括根治性淋巴结清扫手术。随着信息技术的迅速发展,根治性食管切除术在西方逐渐得到认可,而日本则开展了许多新辅助治疗试验。从理论上讲,下一步应该是进行新辅助治疗与手术的III期研究,其中要进行如三野淋巴结清扫这样的高度根治性手术。