Suppr超能文献

原发性网膜附件炎的误诊

Misdiagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis.

作者信息

Rao P M, Rhea J T, Wittenberg J, Warshaw A L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Jul;176(1):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00103-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors determined the radiological misdiagnosis rate of primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA) and its impact on patient management and hospital resource use.

METHODS

A total of 660 computed tomography scans performed for clinically suspected diverticulitis (348 cases) or appendicitis (312 cases) were reviewed for cases meeting strict radiological criteria for PEA. Retrospective interpretations were compared with radiological reports. Medical records and hospital cost data were reviewed to estimate impact on patient management and resource use.

RESULTS

Eleven scans (2%) met criteria for PEA. Seven scans were initially misdiagnosed as diverticulitis (6 patients) or appendicitis (1 patient). All misdiagnosed patients were hospitalized (mean 4.3 days); 6 received antibiotic therapy. Average cost per patient was $4,117. Four scans were initially correctly diagnosed as PEA. One patient was hospitalized (1 day); none received antibiotic therapy. Average cost per patient was $1,205.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiological misdiagnosis of PEA leads to unnecessary hospitalization, medical treatment, and overuse of hospital resources.

摘要

背景

作者确定了原发性网膜附件炎(PEA)的放射学误诊率及其对患者管理和医院资源利用的影响。

方法

对总共660例因临床怀疑憩室炎(348例)或阑尾炎(312例)而进行的计算机断层扫描进行回顾,以查找符合PEA严格放射学标准的病例。将回顾性解读结果与放射学报告进行比较。查阅病历和医院成本数据,以评估对患者管理和资源利用的影响。

结果

11次扫描(2%)符合PEA标准。7次扫描最初被误诊为憩室炎(6例患者)或阑尾炎(1例患者)。所有误诊患者均住院(平均4.3天);6例接受了抗生素治疗。每位患者的平均费用为4117美元。4次扫描最初被正确诊断为PEA。1例患者住院(1天);无人接受抗生素治疗。每位患者的平均费用为1205美元。

结论

PEA的放射学误诊会导致不必要的住院、医疗治疗以及医院资源的过度使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验