Cain B S, Meldrum D R, Meng X, Pulido E J, Banerjee A, Harken A H
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.
J Surg Res. 1998 May;76(2):143-8. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5309.
Approximately 30% of patients suffer supraventricular dysrhythmias after cardiac bypass. While the heart can be constructively preconditioned to maintain function against subsequent ischemic insult using a variety of stimuli across many species, preconditioning in experimental animals is associated with decreased postischemic reperfusion cardiac dysrhythmias. This mode of therapeutic preconditioning has not been previously examined in human atrial myocardium. We therefore hypothesized that preconditioning provides both antidysrhythmic and functional protection to human atria. To study this, human atrial trabeculae were suspended in organ baths, paced at 1 Hz, while force development and ectopy were recorded before and after simulated ischemia. The study consisted of five groups: (1) control trabeculae (n = 12), (2) trabeculae exposed to dysrhythmogenic stimuli (phenylephrine 50 microM and isoproterenol 25 microM (n = 8)), (3) trabeculae exposed to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and then drug stimulated (n = 10), (4) trabeculae preconditioned with adenosine (ADO 125 microM) then drug stimulated (n = 10), and (5) trabeculae preconditioned with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) then drug stimulated (n = 6) each at end reoxygenation. Differences between groups were assessed using X2 analysis and ANOVA (Bonferroni/Dunn). Results demonstrated that human atrial trabeculae did not exhibit dysrhythmia at baseline or when stimulated with alpha and beta agonists. After I/R, control trabeculae exhibited stimulated reperfusion dysrhythmia, while trabeculae preconditioned with either ADO or transient ischemia exhibited decreased stimulated dysrhythmia (each P < 0.05 vs. I/R). Functionally, I/R decreased developed force (DF) to 16 +/- 2% of baseline (%BDF) while ADO pretreatment increased postischemic DF to 41 +/- 3% BDF (P < 0.05 vs. I/R) while IPC increased DF to 49 +/- 3% BDF (P < 0.05 vs. I/R). We conclude that (1) human atrial trabeculae can ve functionally preconditioned with either ADO or IPC, and (2) protective preconditioning/ cardioprotection does extend to dysrhythmia control and is therapeutically accessible in human atrial myocardium.
大约30%的患者在心脏搭桥术后会出现室上性心律失常。虽然在许多物种中,可以使用多种刺激对心脏进行有益的预处理,以维持其功能,抵抗随后的缺血性损伤,但实验动物中的预处理与缺血后再灌注时心脏心律失常的减少有关。这种治疗性预处理模式此前尚未在人类心房心肌中进行过研究。因此,我们假设预处理可为人类心房提供抗心律失常和功能保护。为了研究这一点,将人类心房小梁悬挂在器官浴槽中,以1 Hz的频率起搏,同时在模拟缺血前后记录力的产生和异位搏动。该研究包括五组:(1)对照小梁(n = 12),(2)暴露于致心律失常刺激的小梁(去氧肾上腺素50微摩尔和异丙肾上腺素25微摩尔,n = 8),(3)暴露于缺血-再灌注(I/R)损伤然后接受药物刺激的小梁(n = 10),(4)用腺苷(ADO 125微摩尔)预处理然后接受药物刺激的小梁(n = 10),以及(5)用缺血预处理(IPC)预处理然后接受药物刺激的小梁(n = 6),每组均在再氧合结束时进行。使用X2分析和方差分析(Bonferroni/Dunn)评估组间差异。结果表明,人类心房小梁在基线时或用α和β激动剂刺激时未出现心律失常。I/R后,对照小梁出现刺激后再灌注心律失常,而用ADO或短暂缺血预处理的小梁刺激后心律失常减少(与I/R组相比,每组P < 0.05)。在功能上,I/R使发展力(DF)降至基线的16±2%(%BDF),而ADO预处理使缺血后DF增加至41±3%BDF(与I/R组相比,P < 0.05),IPC使DF增加至49±3%BDF(与I/R组相比,P < 0.05)。我们得出结论:(1)人类心房小梁可用ADO或IPC进行功能预处理,(2)保护性预处理/心脏保护确实可扩展至心律失常控制,且在人类心房心肌中具有治疗可行性。