Suppr超能文献

静脉注射曲马多、可待因和吗啡对人类志愿者胃排空影响的比较。

A comparison of the effects of intravenous tramadol, codeine, and morphine on gastric emptying in human volunteers.

作者信息

Crighton I M, Martin P H, Hobbs G J, Cobby T F, Fletcher A J, Stewart P D

机构信息

University Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):445-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00040.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We compared the effects of i.v. tramadol (1.25 mg/kg), codeine (1 mg/kg), morphine (0.125 mg/kg), and saline on gastric emptying in 10 healthy human volunteers using a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design. Subjects received one treatment at each of four sessions, 2 wk apart. Gastric emptying was studied using the paracetamol absorption test. There were significant differences when comparing all treatments for concentration-time data (P = 0.002), peak serum paracetamol concentrations (Cmax; P < 0.001), times at Cmax (Tmax; P = 0.003), and areas under the curves from Time 0 to 360 min (AUC(0-360); P = 0.049). Morphine profoundly inhibited gastric emptying. Tramadol had measurable but statistically insignificant inhibitory effects on gastric emptying compared with saline (mean +/- SEM: Cmax 22.4 +/- 2.2 vs 26.8 +/- 2.5 mg/L [P = 0.19], Tmax 33 +/- 5.4 vs 19.5 +/- 2.3 min [P = 0.054] for tramadol versus saline, respectively). Compared with morphine, the Cmax (P < 0.01), Tmax, and AUC(0-360) (P < 0.05) values for tramadol were significantly different. The Tmax value for codeine (63.3 +/- 11.7) was greater than that for tramadol (P = 0.034). We conclude that tramadol has a measurable but smaller inhibitory effect on gastric emptying compared with other opioids.

IMPLICATIONS

We compared the effect of tramadol, an unconventional opioid painkiller, on stomach emptying with that of codeine and morphine in a human volunteer study. Tramadol had a measurable but smaller effect and may have clinical and economic advantages in acute pain management compared with conventional painkillers.

摘要

未标注

我们采用双盲、随机、交叉设计,比较了静脉注射曲马多(1.25毫克/千克)、可待因(1毫克/千克)、吗啡(0.125毫克/千克)和生理盐水对10名健康人类志愿者胃排空的影响。受试者在四个疗程中各接受一种治疗,疗程间隔2周。采用对乙酰氨基酚吸收试验研究胃排空情况。在比较所有治疗的浓度-时间数据(P = 0.002)、血清对乙酰氨基酚峰值浓度(Cmax;P < 0.001)、达到Cmax的时间(Tmax;P = 0.003)以及从0至360分钟的曲线下面积(AUC(0 - 360);P = 0.049)时,存在显著差异。吗啡显著抑制胃排空。与生理盐水相比,曲马多对胃排空有可测量但无统计学意义的抑制作用(平均值±标准误:曲马多与生理盐水的Cmax分别为22.4±2.2与26.8±2.5毫克/升[P = 0.19],Tmax分别为33±5.4与19.5±2.3分钟[P = 0.054])。与吗啡相比,曲马多的Cmax(P < 0.01)、Tmax和AUC(0 - 360)(P < 0.05)值有显著差异。可待因的Tmax值(63.3±11.7)大于曲马多(P = 0.034)。我们得出结论,与其他阿片类药物相比,曲马多对胃排空有可测量但较小的抑制作用。

启示

在一项人类志愿者研究中,我们比较了非常规阿片类止痛药曲马多与可待因和吗啡对胃排空的影响。曲马多有可测量但较小的影响,与传统止痛药相比,在急性疼痛管理中可能具有临床和经济优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验