Yan J, Aizawa Y, Honma S, Horiguchi M
Department of Anatomy, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1998 Jun;73(3):247-58.
The nerve supply to the human brachialis muscle has been investigated by many researchers with gross anatomical and/or microdissectional methods. It has been made clear that the brachialis muscle is innervated by two groups of nerve branches, that is, branches from the musculocutaneous nerve innervating most of the muscle and those from the radial nerve innervating the small inferolateral part. However, the constancy of the radial nerve supply is controversial. Furthermore, some researchers have reported a median nerve supply. On the other hand, the morphological meaning of the double nerve supply by the musculocutaneous nerve from the anterior division of the brachial plexus and by the radial nerve from the posterior division has been generally explained to be a result of the fusion of two muscular primordia, one from the ventral (flexor) premuscular mass and the other from the dorsal (extensor) premuscular mass. The inferolateral part of the brachialis muscle has been considered as a detached portion of the brachioradialis muscle. In contrast with this view, there also has been another view that the brachialis muscle has only one origin from the ventral premuscular mass. The branch from the radial nerve derives from the anterior division of the brachial plexus and uses the radial nerve only as a route to the brachialis muscle by unknown mechanisms. However, the latter view has shown no reliable evidence. Therefore, the purposes of this study are 1) to obtain reliable evidence concerning the anterior derivation of nerve fibers of the branch from the radial nerve (by teasing fibers), 2) to make clear the topographical relationship between the nerve fibers from the musculocutaneous nerve and those from the radial nerve in the brachial plexus (by teasing fibers) and in the brachialis muscle (by an investigation of intramuscular nerve supply) and 3) the topographical relationship between nerve fibers to the brachialis muscle and those to the brachioradialis muscle (by teasing fibers), and 4) to investigate the constancy or the incidence of the radial and median nerve supply. Materials used were sixteen human arms of ten cadavers from the 1996 student course of dissection at Iwate Medical University School of Medicine. Two groups of nerve branches innervating the brachialis muscle, one from the musculocutaneous and the other from the radial nerves, were dissected by a gross anatomical method. The best dissected three specimens were used for the fiber analysis (teasing fibers) of the branches to the brachialis and brachioradialis muscles from the branching points to the nerve roots of the brachial plexus and the investigation of the intramuscular nerve supply in the brachialis muscle. The fiber analysis and investigation of the intramuscular nerve supply were done using an operational microscope (Zeiss, 6-H). The results were as follows: 1) The radial nerve supply to the brachialis muscle was constantly observed (the incidence was 16/16), but no median nerve supply was seen. 2) The branch from the musculocutaneous nerve supplied most part of the brachialis muscle except for the small inferolateral part of the muscle supplied by the radial nerve branch. 3) Communications between the two nerve sources were observed in the brachialis muscle in all three cases. 4) Nerve fibers composing the branch from the musculocutaneous nerve derived from the anterior divisions of the ventral rami of the fifth and sixth cervical nerves. 5) Nerve fibers composing the branch from the radial nerve derived from the anterior divisions of the ventral rami of the sixth and seventh cervical nerves, and were situated in the same bundle of fibers with those from the musculocutaneous nerve at the sixth cervical nerve in the first and third cases (right side of the first and second bodies). 6) Nerve fibers composing the branch to the brachioradialis muscle ran in the same bundles with those to the brachialis muscle in the radial nerve, but were situated in the
许多研究人员采用大体解剖和/或显微解剖方法对人类肱肌的神经支配进行了研究。已经明确的是,肱肌由两组神经分支支配,即肌皮神经的分支支配大部分肌肉,而桡神经的分支支配下外侧小部分。然而,桡神经供应的恒定情况存在争议。此外,一些研究人员报告了正中神经的供应情况。另一方面,臂丛神经前支的肌皮神经和后支的桡神经双重神经支配的形态学意义,一般被解释为两个肌肉原基融合的结果,一个来自腹侧(屈肌)肌前质,另一个来自背侧(伸肌)肌前质。肱肌的下外侧部分被认为是肱桡肌的一个分离部分。与这种观点相反,也有另一种观点认为肱肌仅起源于腹侧肌前质。桡神经的分支起源于臂丛神经前支,通过未知机制仅将桡神经用作通往肱肌的路径。然而,后一种观点尚未得到可靠证据的支持。因此,本研究的目的是:1)获得关于桡神经分支神经纤维前向起源的可靠证据(通过纤维分离法);2)明确臂丛神经中肌皮神经和桡神经的神经纤维之间的局部关系(通过纤维分离法)以及肱肌内的局部关系(通过研究肌内神经供应);3)肱肌和肱桡肌的神经纤维之间的局部关系(通过纤维分离法);4)研究桡神经和正中神经供应的恒定情况或发生率。所用材料为岩手医科大学医学院1996年学生解剖课程中1具尸体的16条人臂。采用大体解剖方法解剖了两组支配肱肌的神经分支,一组来自肌皮神经,另一组来自桡神经。对解剖最好的3个标本进行了从臂丛神经根到肱肌和肱桡肌分支的纤维分析(纤维分离)以及肱肌内神经供应的研究。纤维分析和肌内神经供应的研究使用手术显微镜(蔡司,6 - H)进行。结果如下:1)持续观察到桡神经对肱肌的供应(发生率为16/16),但未见正中神经供应。2)肌皮神经的分支支配肱肌的大部分,除了桡神经分支供应的下外侧小部分。3)在所有3例中,肱肌内均观察到两个神经来源之间的交通支。4)构成肌皮神经分支的神经纤维起源于第5和第6颈神经腹侧支的前支。5)构成桡神经分支的神经纤维起源于第6和第7颈神经腹侧支的前支,在第1例和第3例(第1和第2尸体右侧)中,在第6颈神经处与肌皮神经的神经纤维位于同一纤维束中。6)构成肱桡肌分支的神经纤维在桡神经中与肱肌分支的神经纤维走行于同一束,但位于……