Suppr超能文献

[患有结构性心脏病、不明病因晕厥且可诱导室性心律失常的患者接受植入式除颤器治疗]

[Patients with structural heart disease, syncope of unknown etiology and inducible ventricular arrhythmias treated with implantable defibrillators].

作者信息

Aguinaga L, Mont L, Anguera I, Valentino M, Matas M, Brugada J

机构信息

Unidad de Arritmias, Instituto Clínico de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):566-71. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(98)74791-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the hypothesis that in patients with syncope of unknown origin and heart anomalies, inducible ventricular arrhythmias are specific arrhythmias and therefore should be treated as such.

BACKGROUND

Although syncope is a frequent clinical entity, the evaluation and treatment of patients with syncope without a clear etiology still remains undefined. Many patients with syncope of undetermined origin undergo invasive electrophysiologic evaluation. Abnormalities of the sinus node, prolongation of conduction times or inducible arrhythmias found during these evaluations are usually assumed to be the cause of syncope, and are consequently treated. However, whether tachyarrhythmias are truly the cause of syncope, and whether treatment of these tachyarrhythmias can prevent recurrent syncope and arrhythmic death, is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An electrophysiological study was performed on 160 patients with structural heart disease and syncope of unknown origin. In 23 out of the 160 patients (16%), programmed electrical stimulation induced sustained ventricular arrhythmias. In 18 out of the 23 patients an automatic defibrillator was implanted and they form the study group.

RESULTS

In these 18 patients, programmed ventricular stimulation induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 12, sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 2 and ventricular fibrillation in 4. During a mean follow-up of 14 months, 9 patients received 81 appropriate therapies from the device (53 because of ventricular tachycardia and 23 because of ventricular fibrillation). The probability of appropriate therapy was 100% at 1 year follow-up. There were no episodes of sudden death and 1 patient died of congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with syncope of undetermined origin, heart disease and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with a implantable cardioverter defibrillator, there is a high incidence of appropriate therapies. Our results support the practice of using implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with syncope of unknown origin, heart disease and inducible ventricular arrhythmias.

摘要

目的

本研究评估以下假设,即在不明原因晕厥且伴有心脏异常的患者中,可诱发的室性心律失常是特异性心律失常,因此应按此进行治疗。

背景

尽管晕厥是一种常见的临床病症,但对于病因不明的晕厥患者的评估和治疗仍不明确。许多不明原因晕厥的患者接受了有创电生理评估。在这些评估中发现的窦房结异常、传导时间延长或可诱发的心律失常通常被认为是晕厥的原因,因此进行了相应治疗。然而,室上性快速心律失常是否真的是晕厥的原因,以及对这些室上性快速心律失常的治疗能否预防晕厥复发和心律失常性死亡,尚不清楚。

患者和方法

对160例患有结构性心脏病且不明原因晕厥的患者进行了电生理研究。在160例患者中的23例(16%)中,程序电刺激诱发了持续性室性心律失常。在这23例患者中的18例植入了自动除颤器,他们构成了研究组。

结果

在这18例患者中,程序心室刺激诱发了12例持续性单形性室性心动过速、2例持续性多形性室性心动过速和4例心室颤动。在平均14个月的随访期间,9例患者从该装置接受了81次恰当治疗(53次因室性心动过速,23次因心室颤动)。随访1年时恰当治疗的概率为100%。无猝死事件发生,1例患者死于充血性心力衰竭。

结论

在不明原因晕厥、患有心脏病且可诱发室性快速心律失常并接受植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的患者中,恰当治疗的发生率很高。我们的结果支持对不明原因晕厥、患有心脏病且可诱发室性心律失常的患者使用植入式心脏复律除颤器的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验