Bushnell P J
Neurotoxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Aug;138(3-4):231-59. doi: 10.1007/s002130050668.
Increasing awareness that disorders of attention may underlie cognitive dysfunctions associated with intoxication and neurodegenerative disease has stimulated research into the neural bases of attention. Because attention comprises a constellation of hypothetical cognitive processes, it can only be inferred from behavior, of either human or non-human subjects, under appropriate experimental conditions. Many behavioral procedures have been proposed for modeling attention in animals, but not all of these procedures have been systematically associated with specific attentional processes. This review endeavors to evaluate critically the construct validity of these procedures (i.e., to determine the degree to which a given procedure assesses a particular process) and to suggest experiments to improve the conceptual links between these procedures and the processes they purport to assess. Five categories of processes have been identified from the animal literature: orienting, expectancy, stimulus differentiation (including stimulus salience, discrimination of a critical stimulus from its context, and selection among stimuli), sustained attention, and parallel processing. The review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of specific behavioral procedures for assessing these categories of attentional processes and, given the conceptual uncertainties involved, it attempts to summarize the present state of knowledge of the pharmacology and neurobiology of attention.
人们越来越意识到,注意力障碍可能是与中毒和神经退行性疾病相关的认知功能障碍的潜在原因,这激发了对注意力神经基础的研究。由于注意力包含一系列假设的认知过程,因此只能在适当的实验条件下,从人类或非人类受试者的行为中推断出来。已经提出了许多行为程序来模拟动物的注意力,但并非所有这些程序都与特定的注意力过程有系统的关联。本综述旨在批判性地评估这些程序的结构效度(即确定给定程序评估特定过程的程度),并提出实验以改善这些程序与它们声称要评估的过程之间的概念联系。从动物文献中确定了五类过程:定向、预期、刺激辨别(包括刺激显著性、从其背景中辨别关键刺激以及在刺激之间进行选择)、持续注意力和平行处理。本综述讨论了评估这些注意力过程类别的特定行为程序的优缺点,鉴于其中涉及的概念不确定性,它试图总结注意力药理学和神经生物学的当前知识状态。