Rizzo J A, Coady M A, Elefteriades J A
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;51(9):747-54. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00050-x.
Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are potentially lethal medical conditions often requiring surgical intervention. Reliable information on TAA growth rates and associated risk factors is important for managing this challenging patient population. Unfortunately, a number of studies have employed questionable statistical methods, leading to biased and imprecise estimates. The present study describes these statistical problems in existing studies and delineates procedures for obtaining more reliable results. Using data from the Yale Center for Thoracic Aortic Disease, the study compares TAA growth rate estimates using conventional methods versus the recommended approach of instrumental variables (IV) estimation. The IV approach is designed to mitigate problems of measurement errors inherent in existing estimates of TAA growth. The results demonstrate that IV estimation yields more robust and precise estimates of TAA growth rates and risk factors for TAA growth. For example, the conventional approach yields TAA growth rates that fluctuate substantially-from 0.12 cm/yr to 0.90 cm/yr-depending on (1) the minimum serial follow-up period for patient inclusion in the study and (2) how subjects with negative measured growth rates are handled. In contrast, growth rate estimates using the IV approach are much more robust, ranging from 0.12 to 0.13 cm/yr. The 95% confidence intervals of estimated TAA growth are much more compact using the IV approach as well. We conclude that the IV estimation procedure yields more reliable estimates of TAA growth than does the conventional approach.
胸主动脉瘤(TAAs)是一种潜在致命的疾病,通常需要手术干预。关于胸主动脉瘤生长速率及相关风险因素的可靠信息对于管理这一具有挑战性的患者群体至关重要。不幸的是,许多研究采用了有问题的统计方法,导致估计结果存在偏差且不准确。本研究描述了现有研究中的这些统计问题,并阐述了获得更可靠结果的程序。该研究利用耶鲁胸主动脉疾病中心的数据,比较了使用传统方法与推荐的工具变量(IV)估计方法得出的胸主动脉瘤生长速率估计值。IV方法旨在减轻现有胸主动脉瘤生长估计中固有的测量误差问题。结果表明,IV估计得出的胸主动脉瘤生长速率及胸主动脉瘤生长风险因素的估计值更稳健、更精确。例如,传统方法得出的胸主动脉瘤生长速率波动很大,从每年0.12厘米到每年0.90厘米不等,这取决于(1)纳入研究的患者的最短连续随访期,以及(2)如何处理测量生长速率为负的受试者。相比之下,使用IV方法得出 的生长速率估计值要稳健得多,范围在每年0.12厘米至0.13厘米之间。使用IV方法时,估计的胸主动脉瘤生长的95%置信区间也更紧凑。我们得出结论,与传统方法相比,IV估计程序得出的胸主动脉瘤生长估计值更可靠。