Suppr超能文献

Factors affecting clinical outcome following endoscopic perforator vein ablation.

作者信息

Rhodes J M, Gloviczki P, Canton L G, Rooke T, Lewis B D, Lindsey J R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00169-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite good outcomes reported with minimally invasive, subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS), some patients demonstrate poor healing or recurrence of venous ulcers. The goal of this study was to identify factors that lead to failure of SEPS.

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive patients who had undergone 57 SEPS procedures were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 17 +/- 2 months (range 2 weeks to 52 months).

RESULTS

All active ulcers (n = 22) at the time of surgery healed in an average of 99 +/- 37 days (range 11 to 670). Eight limbs had poor healing of their ulcer (>40 days); five (9%) new/recurrent ulcers developed postoperatively. Deep venous obstruction was associated with delayed ulcer healing (316 +/- 171 versus 51 +/- 14 days, P < 0.01) and ulcer recurrence (P < 0.0001). Poor ulcer healing and recurrence were not associated with lipodermatosclerosis, edema, ulcer duration >3 months, or previous recurrences. Ulcer size >2 cm (P < 0.05) and combined ilio-femoral and popliteal/tibial reflux were associated with poor ulcer healing (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SEPS could not prevent recurrent or new ulceration in 9% of limbs. Venous outflow obstruction was associated with ulcer recurrence and prolonged ulcer healing. Multilevel deep venous reflux and ulcer size >2 cm were also associated with delayed healing.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验