Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器与Ⅲ类药物之间的相互作用。

Interactions between implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and class III agents.

作者信息

Movsowitz C, Marchlinski F E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Hahnemann Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1192, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 20;82(4A):41I-48I. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00471-8.

Abstract

Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can successfully terminate ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs are often required to prevent recurrent events. Class III antiarrhythmic agents have emerged as the safest, most effective, and widely used agents in the 40-70% of ICD patients who require concomitant antiarrhythmic medication. Antiarrhythmic agents can influence the effectiveness of ICDs to terminate arrhythmias through their effect on defibrillation threshold. All class III agents share the ability to prolong ventricular refractoriness and those with "pure" class III activity consistently decrease defibrillation threshold in the normal canine heart model. Sotalol, amiodarone, and bretylium all have other Vaughan Williams class actions that influence their respective effects on defibrillation threshold. Sotalol has been associated with a decrease in defibrillation threshold in both animal and in clinical studies, whereas amiodarone has been associated with variable effects in animal models and an increase in defibrillation threshold in clinical studies. Additionally, antiarrhythmic agents may prolong ventricular tachycardia (VT) cycle length, which may affect the ability to pace terminate or cardiovert VT. Amiodarone has a moderate slowing effect on the VT cycle length. Finally, class III drugs also have proarrhythmic potential that may affect the defibrillator's function. Sotalol can be associated with dose-related torsade de pointes, whereas amiodarone may slow the VT cycle length below the tachycardia detection rate cutoff. In conclusion, class III pharmacotherapy can be safely administered in conjunction with ICD therapy as long as the interaction between these therapeutic modalities is appreciated.

摘要

尽管植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)能够成功终止室性心律失常,但通常仍需要使用抗心律失常药物来预防复发事件。在40%至70%需要联合使用抗心律失常药物的ICD患者中,Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物已成为最安全、最有效且应用最广泛的药物。抗心律失常药物可通过影响除颤阈值来影响ICD终止心律失常的有效性。所有Ⅲ类药物都具有延长心室不应期的能力,而具有“纯”Ⅲ类活性的药物在正常犬心脏模型中会持续降低除颤阈值。索他洛尔、胺碘酮和溴苄铵都具有其他Vaughan Williams分类作用,这些作用会影响它们对除颤阈值的各自影响。在动物和临床研究中,索他洛尔都与除颤阈值降低有关,而胺碘酮在动物模型中的影响各异,在临床研究中与除颤阈值升高有关。此外,抗心律失常药物可能会延长室性心动过速(VT)的周期长度,这可能会影响起搏终止或转复VT的能力。胺碘酮对VT周期长度有中等程度的减慢作用。最后,Ⅲ类药物也有致心律失常的潜在风险,可能会影响除颤器的功能。索他洛尔可能与剂量相关的尖端扭转型室速有关,而胺碘酮可能会使VT周期长度减慢至低于心动过速检测率阈值。总之,只要认识到这些治疗方式之间的相互作用,Ⅲ类药物治疗就可以与ICD治疗安全联合使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验