Machado J, Grimont F, Grimont P A
Centre National de Typage Moléculaire des Entérobactéries, Unité des Entérobactéries, INSERM U389, Paris.
Res Microbiol. 1998 Feb;149(2):119-35. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(98)80027-2.
A total of 191 strains of Escherichia coli comprising 164 serovar reference strains and 28 clinical strains were characterized by rRNA gene restriction patterns (ribotypes) generated after cleavage of total DNA with MluI, ClaI or HindIII restriction endonucleases and hybridization of fragments with acetylaminofluorene-labelled 16 + 23S rRNA. A wide diversity of ribotypes was observed with endonucleases MluI (104 patterns), ClaI (90 patterns) and HindIII (98 patterns). When MluI was used, 85% of patterns (11 to 15 fragments) shared five fragments 17.09, 3.94, 3.06, 2.23 and 1.76 kb in size. When these fragments were used as internal standards, the percent errors in fragment length determination was half of that obtained with an external standard. Two fragment size databases of MluI and ClaI ribotypes were built. Automatic identification was obtained after setting the percent fragment size variation tolerance (error) at 5%. MluI ribotyping is recommended as a primary epidemiological marker. Strains with similar MluI ribotype should then be submitted to ClaI ribotyping. Ribotyping with HindIII can only be the third choice, since the patterns were often uncertain due to the frequent occurrence of faint bands. Most of the studied serovars gave discrete patterns and these data provide the basis for a molecular typing system for E. coli which could possibly substitute for serotyping when the latter is not available.
对总共191株大肠杆菌进行了特征分析,其中包括164株血清型参考菌株和28株临床菌株。这些菌株通过用MluI、ClaI或HindIII限制性内切酶切割总DNA后产生的rRNA基因限制性图谱(核糖型)进行表征,并使片段与乙酰氨基芴标记的16 + 23S rRNA杂交。使用MluI(104种图谱)、ClaI(90种图谱)和HindIII(98种图谱)限制性内切酶时,观察到了多种核糖型。当使用MluI时,85%的图谱(11至15个片段)共有5个大小分别为17.09、3.94、3.06、2.23和1.76 kb的片段。当将这些片段用作内标时,片段长度测定的百分比误差是使用外标时的一半。构建了MluI和ClaI核糖型的两个片段大小数据库。将片段大小变化百分比容差(误差)设定为5%后实现了自动鉴定。推荐将MluI核糖分型作为主要的流行病学标记。然后应将具有相似MluI核糖型的菌株进行ClaI核糖分型。使用HindIII进行核糖分型只能作为第三选择,因为由于模糊条带频繁出现,图谱往往不确定。大多数研究的血清型呈现出离散的图谱,这些数据为大肠杆菌分子分型系统提供了基础,当血清分型不可用时,该系统可能替代血清分型。