Grasso R, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F
Human Physiology Section, Scientific Institute Santa Lucia, National Research Council, University of Tor Vergata, 00179 Rome, Italy.
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1868-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1868.
Seven healthy subjects walked forward (FW) and backward (BW) at different freely chosen speeds, while their motion, ground reaction forces, and electromyographic (EMG) activity from lower limb muscles were recorded. We considered the time course of the elevation angles of the thigh, shank, and foot segments in the sagittal plane, the anatomic angles of the hip, knee, and ankle joints, the vertical and longitudinal ground reaction forces, and the rectified EMGs. The elevation angles were the most reproducible variables across trials in each walking direction. After normalizing the time course of each variable over the gait cycle duration, the waveforms of all elevation angles in BW gait were essentially time reversed relative to the corresponding waveforms in FW gait. Moreover, the changes of the thigh, shank, and foot elevation covaried along a plane during the whole gait cycle in both FW and BW directions. Cross-correlation analysis revealed that the phase coupling among these elevation angles is maintained with a simple reversal of the delay on the reversal of walking direction. The extent of FW-BW correspondence also was good for the hip angle, but it was smaller for the knee and ankle angles and for the ground reaction forces. The EMG patterns were drastically different in the two movement directions as was the organization of the muscular synergies measured by cross-correlation analysis. Moreover, at any given speed, the mean EMG activity over the gait cycle was generally higher in BW than in FW gait, suggesting a greater level of energy expenditure in the former task. We argue that conservation of kinematic templates across gait reversal at the expense of a complete reorganization of muscle synergies does not arise from biomechanical constraints but may reflect a behavioral goal achieved by the central networks involved in the control of locomotion.
七名健康受试者以不同的自主选择速度向前(FW)和向后(BW)行走,同时记录他们的运动、地面反作用力以及下肢肌肉的肌电图(EMG)活动。我们考虑了矢状面中大腿、小腿和足部节段的抬高角度的时间进程、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的解剖学角度、垂直和纵向地面反作用力以及经整流的肌电图。在每个行走方向的试验中,抬高角度是最可重复的变量。在将每个变量的时间进程在步态周期持续时间内进行归一化后,BW步态中所有抬高角度的波形相对于FW步态中的相应波形基本上是时间反转的。此外,在整个步态周期中,无论是FW方向还是BW方向,大腿、小腿和足部抬高的变化都沿着一个平面共同变化。互相关分析表明,这些抬高角度之间的相位耦合在行走方向反转时通过简单地反转延迟得以维持。FW - BW对应程度对于髋关节角度也很好,但对于膝关节和踝关节角度以及地面反作用力则较小。两个运动方向的肌电图模式截然不同,通过互相关分析测量的肌肉协同作用的组织方式也是如此。此外,在任何给定速度下,步态周期内的平均肌电图活动在BW步态中通常高于FW步态,这表明前一项任务中的能量消耗水平更高。我们认为,以肌肉协同作用的完全重组为代价,在步态反转时运动学模板的保留并非源于生物力学限制,而是可能反映了参与运动控制的中枢网络所实现的行为目标。