De Lorenzo A, Bertini I, Candeloro N, Iacopino L, Andreoli A, Van Loan M D
Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Scienze Biochimiche, Università di Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Br J Sports Med. 1998 Sep;32(3):215-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.215.
To evaluate the differences in the estimate of body fat percentage (%FM) and the amount (kg) of fat free mass (FFM) by different methods in 26 moderately active adolescents very similar in age, body fatness, and training status.
Mean (SD) age was 16.7 (0.9) years, height was 177.0 (5.1) cm, and weight 68.0 (5.2) kg. %FM was assessed using dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) and two skinfold prediction equations: that of Slaughter et al (%FM Sla) and that of Deurenberg et al (%FM Deu). In the same way, FFM was measured using DXA and different impedance equations: those of Suprasongsin et al (FFM Sup), Schaefer et al (FFM Sch), Houtkooper et al (FFM Hou), and Deurenberg et al (FFM Deu). To determine the interchangeability of the different methods of measuring %FM and FFM, one way analysis of variance, standard error (SE), and coefficient of variation (CV%) ((SD/mean) x 100) were used.
On average, no significant statistical differences were observed between the values determined for %FM: DXA value, 11.7 (5.4%); %FM Sla, 10.9 (4.0)%; %FM Deu, 11.5 (2.3)%. On the other hand, SE and CV% between each pair of the three methods used showed very large variability. With regard to the measurement or prediction of FFM, the mean value measured by DXA was significantly higher than that predicted by the equation of Sch (+7.2 kg, p < 0.001), Deu (+3.2 kg, p < 0.001), and Hou (+2.6 kg, p < 0.001), whereas it was lower than that predicted by the equation of Sup (-1.6 kg, p < 0.05). The Hou and Deu values were the only two that, on average, did not differ in a statistically significant way, although they showed the highest CV%.
In our sample of moderately active adolescents the estimated values for %FM and FFM appear to be highly dependent on method.
评估26名年龄、体脂率和训练状态极为相似的中度活跃青少年,采用不同方法估算体脂百分比(%FM)和去脂体重(FFM)的量(kg)的差异。
平均(标准差)年龄为16.7(0.9)岁,身高为177.0(5.1)厘米,体重为68.0(5.2)千克。使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)以及两个皮褶预测方程评估%FM:即斯劳特等人的方程(%FM Sla)和德伦伯格等人的方程(%FM Deu)。同样地,使用DXA以及不同的阻抗方程测量FFM:即苏普拉松辛等人的方程(FFM Sup)、舍费尔等人的方程(FFM Sch)、胡特库珀等人的方程(FFM Hou)以及德伦伯格等人的方程(FFM Deu)。为确定测量%FM和FFM的不同方法的互换性,采用单因素方差分析、标准误差(SE)和变异系数(CV%)((标准差/均值)×100)。
平均而言,%FM的测定值之间未观察到显著统计学差异:DXA值为11.7(5.4%);%FM Sla为10.9(4.0)%;%FM Deu为11.5(2.3)%。另一方面,所使用的三种方法中每两种方法之间的SE和CV%显示出极大的变异性。关于FFM的测量或预测,DXA测量的平均值显著高于舍费尔方程预测的值(高7.2千克,p < 0.001)、德伦伯格方程预测的值(高3.2千克,p < 0.001)以及胡特库珀方程预测的值(高2.6千克, p < 0.001),而低于苏普拉松辛方程预测的值(低1.6千克,p < 0.05)。胡特库珀和德伦伯格的值是平均而言在统计学上没有显著差异的仅有的两个值,尽管它们显示出最高的CV%。
在我们的中度活跃青少年样本中,%FM和FFM的估算值似乎高度依赖于方法。