Knip M, Karjalainen J, Akerblom H K
Medical School and the Department of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Finland.
Diabetes Care. 1998 Oct;21(10):1670-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.10.1670.
To examine the controversial issue of whether islet cell antibodies (ICAs) have a higher predictive value for progression to clinical IDDM in first-degree relatives of patients with diabetes than in the general population.
ICAs were analyzed with standard immunofluorescence in two population-based groups: 765 sibs of children with recent-onset diabetes and 1,212 unaffected Finnish children <20 years of age at initial screening. Those positive for ICAs were additionally tested for antibodies to GAD (GADAs) and the protein tyrosine phosphatase-related IA-2 antigen (IA-2As). Subsequently, these subjects were observed for the manifestation of clinical IDDM over the next 7 years.
The frequency of both detectable ICAs and ICA levels > or =20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation units (JDF U) was significantly higher among the sibs than in the general population (7.8 vs. 4.1% and 4.8 vs. 2.0%, respectively; P < 0.001). The prevalence of GADAs (37/60 vs. 3/48; P < 0.001) and IA-2As (31/60 vs. 0/48; P < 0.001) was increased among ICA-positive sibs compared with ICA-positive individuals from the background population. Over the next 7 years, 24 sibs (3.1%) and 3 unrelated children positive for ICAs (0.3%) progressed to clinical diabetes. The positive predictive value of ICAs was thus 6% in the general population and 40% among the sibs (P < 0.001), or 13 and 59%, respectively (P < 0.001), with an antibody cutoff level of 20 JDF U. The positive predictive value was related to the number of positive autoantibodies in sibs, which was 57% in those with three antibodies, 50% in those with two antibodies, and only 6% in those with ICAs alone.
These data show that the frequency of multiple autoantibodies is substantially lower in ICA-positive children representing the general population than in ICA-positive sibs of children with IDDM. As a consequence, the predictive value of ICAs for IDDM is higher in sibs of affected children than in the general population. This finding must be taken into account when planning intervention trials aimed at preventing or delaying the manifestation of clinical diabetes in individuals from the general population who test positive for ICAs.
探讨胰岛细胞抗体(ICAs)对糖尿病患者一级亲属进展为临床胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)的预测价值是否高于普通人群这一存在争议的问题。
采用标准免疫荧光法对两个基于人群的组进行ICA分析:765名近期发病糖尿病儿童的同胞以及1212名初筛时年龄<20岁的未受影响的芬兰儿童。对ICA呈阳性者还检测了谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(GADAs)和蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶相关IA-2抗原抗体(IA-2As)。随后,对这些受试者在接下来的7年中进行临床IDDM表现的观察。
同胞组中可检测到的ICA频率以及ICA水平≥20青少年糖尿病基金会单位(JDF U)的频率均显著高于普通人群(分别为7.8%对4.1%以及4.8%对2.0%;P<0.001)。与来自普通人群的ICA阳性个体相比,ICA阳性同胞中GADAs(37/60对3/48;P<0.001)和IA-2As(31/60对0/48;P<0.001)的患病率有所增加。在接下来的7年中,24名同胞(3.1%)和3名ICA阳性的非亲属儿童(0.3%)进展为临床糖尿病。因此,ICA在普通人群中的阳性预测值为6%,在同胞组中为40%(P<0.001),若抗体临界值为20 JDF U,则分别为13%和59%(P<0.001)。阳性预测值与同胞中自身抗体阳性的数量有关,有三种抗体者为57%,有两种抗体者为50%,仅ICA阳性者为6%。
这些数据表明,代表普通人群的ICA阳性儿童中多种自身抗体的频率显著低于IDDM儿童的ICA阳性同胞。因此,ICA对IDDM的预测价值在患病儿童的同胞中高于普通人群。在规划旨在预防或延缓普通人群中ICA检测呈阳性个体临床糖尿病表现的干预试验时,必须考虑这一发现。