Diesendruck G, Gelman S A, Lebowitz K
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA.
Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):823-39. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.823.
Four studies examined the influence of essentialist information and perceptual similarity on preschoolers' interpretations of labels. In Study 1, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds were less likely to interpret 2 labels for animals as referring to mutually exclusive categories: when the animals were said to share internal, rather than superficial, properties and when the animals were perceptually similar rather than dissimilar. In Study 2, neither internal nor functional property information influenced 4-year-olds' interpretations of labels for artifacts. Studies 3 and 4 provide baseline data, demonstrating that the domain differences were not due to prior differences in children's lexical knowledge in the 2 domains. These results suggest that children have essentialist beliefs about animals, but not about artifacts, and that these beliefs interact with children's assumptions about word meaning in determining their interpretations of labels.
四项研究考察了本质主义信息和感知相似性对学龄前儿童标签解释的影响。在研究1中,3岁、4岁和5岁的儿童不太可能将两种动物标签解释为相互排斥的类别:当动物被说成具有内在而非表面的属性时,以及当动物在感知上相似而非不同时。在研究2中,内在属性信息和功能属性信息都没有影响4岁儿童对人工制品标签的解释。研究3和研究4提供了基线数据,表明领域差异并非由于儿童在这两个领域的词汇知识先前存在差异。这些结果表明,儿童对动物有本质主义信念,但对人工制品没有,并且这些信念在决定他们对标签的解释时与儿童对词义的假设相互作用。