Gill J S, Prasad K, Blaszyk K, Ward D E, Camm A J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Oct;21(10):1873-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00005.x.
Initiating sequences for VT may infer the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms. This study examines the initiating sequences of exercise induced idiopathic VT of left bundle branch block-like (LBBB-like) morphology and makes an attempt to relate these to clinical aspects and the mechanisms of arrhythmia. Thirty-two patients (mean age 33.4 +/- 13.2 years; 18 men) with exercise induced VT in the absence of structural cardiac abnormality on history, clinical examination, and noninvasive and invasive investigations were divided into two groups on the basis of the initiating sequence of VT on exercise. Group I consisted of patients with long-short sequence of RR intervals prior to the onset of VT (initiating/preinitiating cycle length ratio < or = 0.78). Group II consisted of patients without changes in cycle length prior to VT. Group I mechanism would suggest delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) or reentry whereas group II mechanism triggered activity due to early afterdepolarizations. Fourteen patients (group I) had long-short sequence and 18 patients (group II) were without cycle length changes prior to VT initiated during exercise. VT axis was inferior in all 18 patients in group II but only in 9 patients in group I (P = 0.02). In these predefined patient groups, sustained monomorphic VT could not be initiated by programmed stimulation in any patient in group I, whereas four patients in group II had inducible VT. Patients in group II also had higher incidence of sustained VT on ambulatory monitoring (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ in other respects. This study demonstrates the existence of at least two possible mechanisms of initiation of exercise induced idiopathic VT of LBBB-like morphology. VT initiated without cycle length changes is more common, more likely to have an inferior axis suggesting an outflow tract origin, and is probably related to triggered activity secondary to DADs. VT initiated with a long-short sequence is more often nonsustained and may have a superior axis suggesting an origin from the body or septal region of the ventricle. The two groups, therefore, exhibit differences in electrophysiological characteristics that may aid classification and therapy of this arrhythmia.
室性心动过速(VT)的起始序列可能提示潜在的致心律失常机制。本研究检测了运动诱发的左束支传导阻滞样(LBBB样)形态的特发性VT的起始序列,并试图将这些序列与临床情况及心律失常机制联系起来。32例(平均年龄33.4±13.2岁;18例男性)运动诱发VT且经病史、临床检查以及无创和有创检查均未发现心脏结构异常的患者,根据运动时VT的起始序列分为两组。第一组患者在VT发作前RR间期呈长短序列(起始/预起始周期长度比≤0.78)。第二组患者在VT发作前周期长度无变化。第一组的机制提示延迟后除极(DADs)或折返,而第二组的机制为早期后除极引发的触发活动。14例患者(第一组)有长短序列,18例患者(第二组)在运动诱发VT前周期长度无变化。第二组的所有18例患者VT电轴均为下壁导联,但第一组仅9例患者如此(P=0.02)。在这些预先定义的患者组中,第一组的任何患者经程序刺激均不能诱发持续性单形性VT,而第二组有4例患者可诱发出VT。第二组患者动态心电图监测时持续性VT的发生率也较高(P<0.05)。两组在其他方面无差异。本研究表明,至少存在两种可能的机制引发运动诱发的LBBB样形态的特发性VT。无周期长度变化而起始的VT更为常见,更可能具有下壁导联电轴提示起源于流出道,且可能与DADs继发的触发活动有关。以长短序列起始的VT多为非持续性,可能具有上壁导联电轴提示起源于心室体部或间隔区域。因此,两组在电生理特征上存在差异,这可能有助于对这种心律失常进行分类和治疗。