Murakawa Y, Yamashita T, Kanese Y, Omata M
Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Oct;21(10):1901-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00009.x.
This study was designed to extend our knowledge on how pharmacological modification of defibrillation efficacy is associated with shock waveform. In 35 anesthetized dogs, the baseline transcardiac DFT was determined using 12-ms monophasic and three biphasic waveforms (10 ms-2 ms, 8 ms-4 ms, and 6 ms-6 ms). Twenty-eight dogs were then treated with either lidocaine (n = 7), mexiletine (n = 7), dofetilide (n = 7), or MS-551 (n = 7), while 7 dogs were left untreated to confirm the reproducibility of DFT data. Subsequently, DFT measurements were repeated in all dogs. Waveform related differences of the baseline DFT were significant, and the monophasic DFT was higher than any of the biphasic DFTs. Lidocaine increased DFT by 11% +/- 12% (12-ms monophasic), 20% +/- 20% (10 ms-2 ms, P < 0.05), 13% +/- 20% (8 ms-4 ms), and 12% +/- 10% (6 ms-6 ms, P < 0.05). With infusion of mexiletine, the DFT increased by 17% +/- 16% (P < 0.05), 9% +/- 12%, 10% +/- 10% (P < 0.05), and 4% +/- 15%, respectively. Both dofetilide and MS-551 significantly decreased the DFT regardless of the pulse waveform (dofetilide: from -18% +/- 19% to -24% +/- 19%, MS-551; from -18% +/- 11% to -32% +/- 6%). In all drug groups, waveform related differences in DFT remained significant. These results support the view that the advantages of biphasic shock waveforms are not lessened by treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs.
本研究旨在拓展我们对于除颤效果的药理学改变如何与电击波形相关的认识。在35只麻醉犬中,使用12毫秒单相波和三种双相波(10毫秒 - 2毫秒、8毫秒 - 4毫秒和6毫秒 - 6毫秒)测定基线经心内膜除颤阈值(DFT)。然后,28只犬接受利多卡因(n = 7)、美西律(n = 7)、多非利特(n = 7)或MS - 551(n = 7)治疗,而7只犬未接受治疗以确认DFT数据的可重复性。随后,对所有犬重复进行DFT测量。基线DFT的波形相关差异显著,单相DFT高于任何一种双相DFT。利多卡因使DFT升高11%±12%(12毫秒单相波)、20%±20%(10毫秒 - 2毫秒,P < 0.05)、13%±20%(8毫秒 - 4毫秒)和12%±10%(6毫秒 - 6毫秒,P < 0.05)。输注美西律后,DFT分别升高17%±16%(P < 0.05)、9%±12%、10%±10%(P < 0.05)和4%±15%。多非利特和MS - 551均显著降低DFT,无论脉冲波形如何(多非利特:从 - 18%±19%降至 - 24%±19%,MS - 551:从 - 18%±11%降至 - 32%±6%)。在所有药物组中,DFT的波形相关差异仍然显著。这些结果支持这样的观点,即双相电击波形的优势不会因抗心律失常药物治疗而减弱。