CT活检的准确性:激光引导与传统徒手技术对比
Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques.
作者信息
Pereles F S, Baker M, Baldwin R, Krupinski E, Unger E C
机构信息
Department of Radiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, USA.
出版信息
Acad Radiol. 1998 Nov;5(11):766-70. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80260-2.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine whether laser-guided computed tomographic (CT) biopsy is more accurate than CT-guided biopsy with conventional freehand techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two independent operators performed an equal number of freehand and laser-guided needle passes at varying single and double angles (0 degree, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 25 degrees/30 degrees, and 25 degrees/60 degrees) on targets within six pork and beef phantoms. A total of 180 biopsy passes were performed, and error distances of needle tip to target were tabulated. Data were analyzed by means of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the accuracy of laser guidance with freehand passes. ANOVA and correlation analysis were also used to confirm the relative equivalency of phantom targets and biopsy parameters.
RESULTS
Overall, laser-guided passes were statistically significantly more accurate than freehand passes. Mean error with laser guidance was 5.01 mm (standard error [SE] = 0.41 mm), whereas mean error with freehand techniques was 10.58 mm (SE = 0.82 mm) (F = 52.0, df = 1.17, P = .0001). Ninety-three percent of laser-guided passes and 56% of freehand passes were within 1 cm of the intended target. Error increased for both laser-guided and freehand techniques with larger angles or double-angle biopsies, but the increases were greater with freehand technique. No statistically significant differences existed between the targets themselves or biopsy parameters for the two operators.
CONCLUSION
Laser-guided CT biopsies were more accurate than freehand CT biopsies. Practical advantages of laser guidance over freehand CT biopsy methods may include decreased procedure times and reduced patient morbidity.
原理与目的
本研究旨在确定激光引导的计算机断层扫描(CT)活检是否比传统徒手技术引导的CT活检更准确。
材料与方法
两名独立操作人员在六个猪肉和牛肉模型内的目标上,以不同的单角度和双角度(0度、30度、60度、25度/30度和25度/60度)进行了相同数量的徒手和激光引导下的穿刺。共进行了180次活检穿刺,并将针尖到目标的误差距离制成表格。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析,以比较激光引导与徒手穿刺的准确性。ANOVA和相关性分析还用于确认模型目标和活检参数的相对等效性。
结果
总体而言,激光引导穿刺在统计学上比徒手穿刺更准确。激光引导下的平均误差为5.01毫米(标准误差[SE]=0.41毫米),而徒手技术的平均误差为10.58毫米(SE=0.82毫米)(F=52.0,自由度=1.17,P=0.0001)。93%的激光引导穿刺和56%的徒手穿刺在距预期目标1厘米范围内。随着角度增大或进行双角度活检,激光引导和徒手技术的误差均增加,但徒手技术的增加幅度更大。两名操作人员的目标本身或活检参数之间不存在统计学上的显著差异。
结论
激光引导的CT活检比徒手CT活检更准确。激光引导相对于徒手CT活检方法的实际优势可能包括减少操作时间和降低患者发病率。