Suppr超能文献

改善平衡。

Improving balance.

作者信息

Robbins S, Waked E, Krouglicof N

机构信息

McGill University Centre for Studies in Aging, Montreal General Hospital, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Nov;46(11):1363-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06002.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that shoes made with a sole material that retains compressed thickness between steps (low resiliency) provide balance better than and comfort equal to shoes composed of high resiliency sole material.

SETTING

Older subjects were recruited from a medical clinic population, and younger subjects came from a recreational sports population.

DESIGN

A randomized-order, cross-over, controlled comparison design.

PARTICIPANTS

Groups comprised random samples of 30 older (mean age 66 years, SD+/-3.0), and 30 younger (mean age 34 years, SD+/-6.0) healthy men who met age selection criteria.

MEASUREMENTS

Stability was inferred by sway measures: sway velocity (cm x s(-1)), X-Y area (cm2), and radial area (cm2). Comfort was measured by direct scaling and magnitude estimation using an 11-point ratio scale.

RESULTS

Stability inferred by sway velocity was 311% (P < .001) and 31% (P < .001) poorer for younger and older groups, respectively, for high and low resiliency interfaces. Sway velocity with low resiliency interface was lower than bare platform, the lowest ever recorded under equivalent conditions (P < .001). All interfaces were equally comfortable.

CONCLUSIONS

Stability rises with low resiliency interfaces and declines with high resiliency interfaces: sway velocity in older people wearing hard-soled footwear incorporating low resiliency technology would be 20% lower than in younger people wearing most current athletic and walking shoes. Inasmuch as existing theory can not account for improved balance with interfaces, we propose that when humans are supported by rigid support surfaces, elastic biologic tissues store energy from postural adjustments and locomotion, which is returned as a reaction force causing overshoot. This amplifies frontal plane foot movement and attenuates foot position awareness, causing less precise postural adjustments and instability. Low resiliency interfaces dissipate energy and thereby moderate overshoot. Low resiliency interface technology is capable of improving stability, which portends improved health for unstable older people in particular.

摘要

目的

验证以下假设:采用在行走步间能保持压缩厚度的鞋底材料(低弹性)制成的鞋子,在提供平衡方面优于且舒适度等同于由高弹性鞋底材料制成的鞋子。

设置

老年受试者从医疗诊所人群中招募,年轻受试者来自休闲运动人群。

设计

随机顺序、交叉、对照比较设计。

参与者

两组均为符合年龄选择标准的30名健康男性随机样本,其中老年组平均年龄66岁,标准差±3.0;年轻组平均年龄34岁,标准差±6.0。

测量

通过摇摆测量推断稳定性:摇摆速度(厘米×秒⁻¹)、X - Y面积(平方厘米)和径向面积(平方厘米)。使用11点比率量表通过直接评分和量级估计来测量舒适度。

结果

对于高弹性和低弹性界面,年轻组和老年组通过摇摆速度推断出的稳定性分别差311%(P <.001)和31%(P <.001)。低弹性界面的摇摆速度低于裸平台,这是在同等条件下记录到的最低值(P <.001)。所有界面的舒适度相同。

结论

稳定性随低弹性界面升高而随高弹性界面降低:穿着采用低弹性技术的硬底鞋的老年人的摇摆速度比穿着大多数当前运动鞋和步行鞋的年轻人低20%。鉴于现有理论无法解释界面如何改善平衡,我们提出,当人体由刚性支撑表面支撑时,弹性生物组织会储存姿势调整和运动产生的能量,并作为反作用力返回,导致超调。这会放大额面足部运动并削弱足部位置感知,导致姿势调整不够精确和不稳定。低弹性界面会耗散能量,从而减轻超调。低弹性界面技术能够提高稳定性,这尤其预示着对不稳定的老年人健康状况的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验