Peabody J W, Luck J
West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Nov 23;158(21):2291-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.21.2291.
Under increasing pressure to provide more efficient, higher-quality care, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is expanding primary care and implementing other managed care techniques. To assess the magnitude of performance improvement possible in the VA and to investigate potential barriers to implementation of new techniques, we compared a VA facility with similar managed care organizations on specific managed care performance benchmarks. METHODS AND DATA COLLECTION: Detailed case studies of a large VA medical center and a large capitated multispecialty group practice in the same region were carried out. Various qualitative and quantitative data were collected between October 1, 1994, and September 30, 1997. Unstructured and semistructured interviews, participant and direct observations, document review, electronic data abstractions, and patient surveys were used to collect the data.
Patients in the VA medical center were poorer (average income, $13300 per year), older (36.5% aged 65 years and older), and more likely to be homeless (10.5%). The VA patients saw more specialists and made more emergency department visits than managed care patients. Although the VA had better electronic information flows, its providers saw fewer patients, had more unscheduled visits, and received fewer consultant reports, and its patients waited longer. Inpatient utilization was also higher (length of stay averaged 8 days) among VA primary care patients.
On many dimensions the VA did not compare favorably with the efficiency or lower utilization of the capitated managed care practice. Part of the reason must be attributed to the VA's multiple missions, which include teaching and research; another reason is the VA's role to be a service provider to all eligible veterans regardless of sociodemographic or health characteristics. Whether these differences are also caused by different case mix, or differences in socioeconomic status of patients, surprisingly is not well understood. This hampers future efforts to use managed care techniques to improve the operation of the VA.
在提供更高效、更高质量医疗服务的压力不断增加的情况下,退伍军人事务部(VA)正在扩大初级医疗服务并实施其他管理式医疗技术。为了评估VA可能实现的绩效提升幅度,并调查实施新技术的潜在障碍,我们将一家VA医疗机构与类似的管理式医疗组织在特定的管理式医疗绩效基准方面进行了比较。
对同一地区的一家大型VA医疗中心和一家大型按人头付费的多专科集团诊所进行了详细的案例研究。在1994年10月1日至1997年9月30日期间收集了各种定性和定量数据。通过非结构化和半结构化访谈、参与观察和直接观察、文件审查、电子数据提取以及患者调查来收集数据。
VA医疗中心的患者更贫困(平均年收入为13300美元)、年龄更大(36.5%的患者年龄在65岁及以上),且更有可能无家可归(10.5%)。与管理式医疗患者相比,VA患者看专科医生的次数更多,去急诊科就诊的次数也更多。尽管VA的电子信息流更好,但其医护人员看诊的患者较少,非预约就诊更多,收到的会诊报告更少,患者等待时间更长。VA初级医疗患者的住院利用率也更高(平均住院时长为8天)。
在许多方面,VA在效率或较低利用率方面与按人头付费的管理式医疗实践相比并不占优势。部分原因必须归因于VA的多重使命,包括教学和研究;另一个原因是VA要为所有符合条件的退伍军人提供服务,无论其社会人口统计学或健康特征如何。令人惊讶的是,这些差异是否也由不同的病例组合或患者社会经济地位的差异导致,目前还没有得到很好的理解。这阻碍了未来利用管理式医疗技术改善VA运营的努力。