Lewis D J, Thorpe S A, Wilkinson K, Reynolds S L
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, CSL Food Science Laboratory, Colney, Norwich, UK.
Food Addit Contam. 1998 Jul;15(5):506-9. doi: 10.1080/02652039809374674.
Potatoes, which had been treated 'in the field' with a commercial formulation of maleic hydrazide, were processed into potato crisps and jacket potato crisps on a factory production line using standard manufacturing conditions. Samples were taken at strategic points throughout the process and analysed to determine the degree of carry-through of residues. Results demonstrated that ca 56% of the maleic hydrazide residue in a potato could be carried through into the potato crisps, irrespective of which type of crisp was being manufactured. Results from a similarly constructed study investigating the fate of pesticides applied post-harvest showed that carry-through was less than 10%. This difference is explained in terms of the different modes of action of the two classes of pesticides being investigated. It is known that, as maleic hydrazide is a systemic pesticide, it will be located within the flesh of the potato tuber and is therefore likely to be protected from the various stages of the crisping process. However, the post-harvest non-systemic pesticides are applied to the exterior surface of the tuber and are therefore not likely to be protected in the same way. The results also showed that, due to the concentration effect caused by the loss of moisture during crisp manufacture, the levels of maleic hydrazide residues in crisps (on a mg/kg product basis) were approximately twice those measured in the original potatoes.
用马来酰肼商业配方在“田间”处理过的土豆,在工厂生产线上采用标准制造条件加工成薯片和带皮薯片。在整个加工过程中的关键节点取样并进行分析,以确定残留物的残留程度。结果表明,无论生产哪种薯片,土豆中约56%的马来酰肼残留物会残留到薯片中。一项类似的关于收获后施用农药去向的研究结果表明,残留率低于10%。这种差异可以用所研究的两类农药不同的作用方式来解释。众所周知,由于马来酰肼是一种内吸性农药,它会存在于马铃薯块茎的内部,因此在薯片加工的各个阶段可能受到保护。然而,收获后施用的非内吸性农药是施用于块茎的外表面,因此不太可能以同样的方式受到保护。结果还表明,由于薯片制作过程中水分流失导致的浓缩效应,薯片中马来酰肼残留量(以mg/kg产品计)约为原始土豆中测得量的两倍。