Davey G C, Levy S
Psychology Group, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):576-86. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.4.576.
This article describes 6 studies that have used a catastrophizing interview technique to investigate some of the characteristics of catastrophic worrying. The main findings were (a) worriers were willing to catastrophize both a positive aspect of their life and a new hypothetical worry significantly more than nonworriers, (b) worriers were more likely than nonworriers to rate catastrophizing steps for a new worry as containing information relevant to existing worries, (c) worriers displayed a general iterative style that was independent of the valency of the iterative task, and (d) worriers tended to couch their worries in terms of personal inadequacies, and personal inadequacy became a feature of their catastrophizing regardless of the worry topic. Worriers' tendency to couch worries and catastrophizing steps in terms of personal inadequacies and their perseverative iterative style are both important contributors to the unresolved catastrophic thought experienced by chronic worriers.
本文介绍了6项研究,这些研究运用了灾难化访谈技巧来探究灾难性担忧的一些特征。主要研究结果如下:(a)与非担忧者相比,担忧者更愿意对生活中的积极方面和新的假设性担忧进行灾难化;(b)与非担忧者相比,担忧者更有可能将新担忧的灾难化步骤评定为包含与现有担忧相关的信息;(c)担忧者表现出一种普遍的反复思考风格,这种风格与反复思考任务的效价无关;(d)担忧者倾向于用个人不足来表达他们的担忧,并且无论担忧的主题是什么,个人不足都成为了他们灾难化的一个特征。担忧者倾向于用个人不足来表达担忧和灾难化步骤,以及他们坚持不懈的反复思考风格,都是导致慢性担忧者经历未解决的灾难性思维的重要因素。