Suppr超能文献

灾难性担忧:个人能力不足和一种持续反复的思维方式作为灾难化过程的特征。

Catastrophic worrying: personal inadequacy and a perseverative iterative style as features of the catastrophizing process.

作者信息

Davey G C, Levy S

机构信息

Psychology Group, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):576-86. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.4.576.

Abstract

This article describes 6 studies that have used a catastrophizing interview technique to investigate some of the characteristics of catastrophic worrying. The main findings were (a) worriers were willing to catastrophize both a positive aspect of their life and a new hypothetical worry significantly more than nonworriers, (b) worriers were more likely than nonworriers to rate catastrophizing steps for a new worry as containing information relevant to existing worries, (c) worriers displayed a general iterative style that was independent of the valency of the iterative task, and (d) worriers tended to couch their worries in terms of personal inadequacies, and personal inadequacy became a feature of their catastrophizing regardless of the worry topic. Worriers' tendency to couch worries and catastrophizing steps in terms of personal inadequacies and their perseverative iterative style are both important contributors to the unresolved catastrophic thought experienced by chronic worriers.

摘要

本文介绍了6项研究,这些研究运用了灾难化访谈技巧来探究灾难性担忧的一些特征。主要研究结果如下:(a)与非担忧者相比,担忧者更愿意对生活中的积极方面和新的假设性担忧进行灾难化;(b)与非担忧者相比,担忧者更有可能将新担忧的灾难化步骤评定为包含与现有担忧相关的信息;(c)担忧者表现出一种普遍的反复思考风格,这种风格与反复思考任务的效价无关;(d)担忧者倾向于用个人不足来表达他们的担忧,并且无论担忧的主题是什么,个人不足都成为了他们灾难化的一个特征。担忧者倾向于用个人不足来表达担忧和灾难化步骤,以及他们坚持不懈的反复思考风格,都是导致慢性担忧者经历未解决的灾难性思维的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验