Cleary M I, Murray J M, Michael R, Piper K
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.
Med J Aust. 1998 Oct 19;169(S1):S26-31.
The Outpatient Costing and Classification Study was commissioned by the Department of Health and Family Services to evaluate the suitability of the Developmental Ambulatory Classification System (DACS). Data on the full range of ambulatory services (outpatient clinics, emergency departments and allied health services) were collected prospectively from a stratified sample of 28 public hospitals. Patient encounters captured in the study represent 1% of the total ambulatory encounters in Australia in one year. Costing per encounter included time spent with the patient, cost of procedures, indirect costs (salaries and consumables), overhead costs and diagnostic costs. The most significant variable explaining cost variation was hospital type, followed by outpatient clinic type. Visit type and presence or absence of a procedure--major splits for the proposed DACS--did not produce splits that were consistent across all hospital strata. The study found that DACS is not an appropriate classification for hospital ambulatory services. A clinic-based structure for outpatients and allied health departments is recommended for classifying and funding ambulatory services in Australia.
门诊成本核算与分类研究由卫生与家庭服务部委托开展,旨在评估发育性门诊分类系统(DACS)的适用性。前瞻性地从28家公立医院的分层样本中收集了全方位门诊服务(门诊诊所、急诊科和专职医疗服务)的数据。该研究中记录的患者诊疗量占澳大利亚一年门诊诊疗总量的1%。每次诊疗的成本核算包括与患者相处的时间、诊疗程序成本、间接成本(薪资和耗材)、管理费用和诊断成本。解释成本差异的最显著变量是医院类型,其次是门诊诊所类型。就诊类型以及是否进行诊疗(拟议的DACS的主要分类标准)并未产生在所有医院层级中都一致的分类。研究发现,DACS并非适用于医院门诊服务的分类。建议采用基于诊所的结构对澳大利亚的门诊和专职医疗部门进行分类及提供资金。