Olieman A F, van Ginkel R J, Molenaar W M, Schraffordt Koops H, Hoekstra H J
Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;118(1-2):70-4. doi: 10.1007/s004020050314.
The management of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities in patients who present with regional and/or distant metastases at the time of diagnosis remains an unsolved problem. The recently introduced hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and melphalan has been shown to be an effective limb-saving treatment modality, but is it feasible to use this approach with palliative intent? Nine patients, five men and four women, mean age 41 (range 21-75) years with locally advanced extremity STS and regional (n = 3) or distant (n = 6) metastases at the time of diagnosis, underwent a palliative HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan. Resection of the residual tumour mass was performed, if possible, 6-8 weeks after HILP. Treatment-related morbidity, local recurrences and the limb salvage rate were scored during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 9 (range 3-39) months (seven deaths, but six were due to metastatic disease). Treatment-related morbidity was seen after 3 of the 10 perfusions performed (30%) and consisted of superficial wound infections (n = 2), blow out of the external iliac artery followed by an iliac thrombosis (n = 1). Two patients showed local recurrences after HILP followed by resection of the residual tumour mass, and one patient showed local progression after two perfusions without resection. Limb salvage was achieved in 8 patients (89%). Therefore, HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan for locally advanced extremity STS in patients with disseminated disease is feasible. The local management of locally advanced extremity STS should be the same whether the intent is curative or palliative, as the local control improves the quality of life.
对于诊断时出现区域和/或远处转移的肢体局部晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)患者,其治疗仍是一个未解决的问题。最近引入的采用肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和美法仑的热灌注隔离肢体疗法(HILP)已被证明是一种有效的保肢治疗方式,但以姑息为目的使用这种方法是否可行呢?9例患者,5例男性和4例女性,平均年龄41岁(范围21 - 75岁),诊断时患有肢体局部晚期STS且有区域转移(n = 3)或远处转移(n = 6),接受了采用TNF-α和美法仑的姑息性HILP治疗。如果可能,在HILP治疗后6 - 8周切除残留肿瘤块。在随访期间对治疗相关的发病率、局部复发情况和保肢率进行评分。中位随访期为9个月(范围3 - 39个月)(7例死亡,但6例死于转移性疾病)。在进行的10次灌注中有3次(30%)出现了治疗相关的发病率,包括表浅伤口感染(n = 2)、髂外动脉破裂继发髂静脉血栓形成(n = 1)。2例患者在HILP治疗后出现局部复发,随后切除了残留肿瘤块,1例患者在两次灌注后未切除肿瘤出现局部进展。8例患者(89%)实现了保肢。因此,对于患有播散性疾病的肢体局部晚期STS患者,采用TNF-α和美法仑的HILP是可行的。无论治疗目的是治愈性还是姑息性,肢体局部晚期STS的局部治疗方法都应相同,因为局部控制可改善生活质量。