Suppr超能文献

住院患者的透析剂量未达最佳水平。

Delivered dialysis dose is suboptimal in hospitalized patients.

作者信息

Obialo C I, Hernandez B, Carter D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310-1495, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 1998;18(6):525-30. doi: 10.1159/000013399.

Abstract

Underdialyzed patients have high hospitalization and mortality rates. It is unclear if such patients receive adequate dialysis during hospitalization. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated single treatment delivered dialysis dose during hospitalization and compared this to the dosage received at the free-standing outpatient clinics in the same patients. Eighty-four patients (54% male) aged 23-63 years (means +/- SD 55.5 +/- 14.6) who have been on dialysis for at least 3 months were evaluated. Hypertension and diabetes were the most common diagnoses, while thrombosed graft or fistula accounted for 40% of admissions. The mean dialysis treatment time (Td) was 30 min longer in the outpatient (OP) setting than the hospital (H): 3.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2 h (p < 0.0001). Attained blood flow (QB) was 15% greater in the OP than H: 394 +/- 40 vs. 331 +/- 54 ml/min (p < 0.0001). The Kt/V was analyzed in 49 of 84 patients; the OP Kt/V was 20% greater than the H Kt/V: 1.38 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.11 +/- 0.1 (p < 0.0001). A further breakdown of H Kt/V according to access and membrane types showed that patients with functional grafts/fistula had a higher Kt/V than those with temporary accesses 1.14 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.1 (p = 0.01). We conclude that hospitalized patients receive suboptimal dialysis dose, this could have a negative impact on survival if hospitalization is recurrent and prolonged. Kinetic modeling should be routinely performed in such patients and Td should be increased in patients with temporary accesses.

摘要

透析不充分的患者住院率和死亡率较高。目前尚不清楚这类患者在住院期间是否接受了充分的透析治疗。在这项横断面研究中,我们评估了患者住院期间单次透析治疗的剂量,并将其与同一患者在独立门诊所接受的剂量进行比较。我们评估了84例年龄在23至63岁(平均年龄±标准差为55.5±14.6)且已接受透析至少3个月的患者(男性占54%)。高血压和糖尿病是最常见的诊断疾病,而血栓形成的移植物或瘘管占入院原因的40%。门诊(OP)环境下的平均透析治疗时间(Td)比住院时(H)长30分钟:分别为3.6±0.3小时和3.1±0.2小时(p<0.0001)。门诊的实际血流量(QB)比住院时高15%:分别为394±40和331±54毫升/分钟(p<着0.0001)。对84例患者中的49例进行了Kt/V分析;门诊的Kt/V比住院时高20%:分别为1.38±0.2和1.11±0.1(p<0.0001)。根据血管通路和透析膜类型对住院患者的Kt/V进行进一步细分显示,具有功能性移植物/瘘管的患者的Kt/V高于采用临时血管通路的患者,分别为1.14±0.1和1.07±0.1(p = 0.01)。我们得出结论,住院患者接受的透析剂量未达最佳,如果反复住院且住院时间延长,这可能对生存率产生负面影响。对于这类患者应常规进行动力学建模,对于采用临时血管通路的患者应增加透析治疗时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验