Rostaing L, Chatelut E, Payen J L, Izopet J, Thalamas C, Ton-That H, Pascal J P, Durand D, Canal P
Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplant Department, University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Dec;9(12):2344-8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V9122344.
In this prospective controlled study, the pharmacokinetic profiles of alpha-interferon 2b (alphaIFN-2b) were determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) dialysis and nonuremic patients, after a single subcutaneous injection of 3 million units. Ten HCV+/RNA+ patients (group A) with a normal renal function (mean serum creatinine: 1.03 +/- 0.26 [SD] mg/dl) and 10 HCV+/RNA+ patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (group B) were included. The pharmacokinetic profiles of alphaIFN were determined after the very first subcutaneous injection of the drug. Plasma alphaIFN concentrations were determined before the injection and then 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36 h after the injection. They were assessed by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test. Patients from both groups had a similar body surface area. It was found that in group B: (1) the mean maximum (SD) serum alphaIFN concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher (52 +/- 12 pg/ml) than in group A (39 +/- 12 pg/ml; P = 0.03); (2) the time at which Cmax occurred (Tmax) was significantly higher (10 +/- 3 h) than in group A (7.5 +/- 2 h; P = 0.05); (3) the observed area under the plasma alphaIFN concentration-time curve was about twice as much, i.e., 936 +/- 212 pg x h/ml, as that for group A (485 +/- 184 pg x h/ml; P < 0.0001); and (4) the alphaIFN half-life was significantly longer (9.6 +/- 2.9 h) than in group A (5.3 +/- 1.3 h). As early as 24 h after the alphaIFN injection was given, the drug was no longer detectable in nonuremic patients' sera, whereas it could be detected up to the next injection in all of the dialysis patients' sera. When trough levels of alphaIFN were measured just before the 10th injection, they were always below the threshold level in the 10 patients from group A, i.e., 4.1 pg/ml, whereas in group B they were measurable for four of nine patients (P = 0.05) and ranged between 5.8 and 36.1 pg/ml. Severe neurologic side effects were observed only in group B, i.e., in three patients. Hemoglobin levels did significantly decrease but only in group B patients, and this was significantly correlated with the Cmax (r = 0.67; P = 0.03). This is the first controlled study to demonstrate that the clearance of alphaIFN is about twice as low in dialysis patients as in nonuremic patients. These results might be of relevance when deciding the optimal alphaIFN therapy scheme for HCV+ patients, either with normal renal function or undergoing chronic hemodialysis.
在这项前瞻性对照研究中,采用酶联免疫吸附测定法,对丙型肝炎病毒阳性(HCV+)的透析患者和非尿毒症患者单次皮下注射300万单位α-干扰素2b(αIFN-2b)后的药代动力学特征进行了测定。研究纳入了10例肾功能正常(平均血清肌酐:1.03±0.26[标准差]mg/dl)的HCV+/RNA+患者(A组)和10例接受慢性血液透析的HCV+/RNA+患者(B组)。在首次皮下注射该药物后测定αIFN的药代动力学特征。在注射前以及注射后1、2、3、4、6、8、12、16、20、24、28、32和36小时测定血浆αIFN浓度。通过酶联免疫吸附测定试验进行评估。两组患者的体表面积相似。结果发现,B组:(1)血清αIFN平均最大(标准差)浓度(Cmax)显著高于A组(52±12 pg/ml比39±12 pg/ml;P=0.03);(2)Cmax出现的时间(Tmax)显著高于A组(10±3小时比7.5±2小时;P=0.05);(3)血浆αIFN浓度-时间曲线下观察到的面积约为A组的两倍,即936±212 pg·h/ml比485±184 pg·h/ml;P<0.0001;(4)αIFN半衰期显著长于A组(9.6±2.9小时比5.3±1.3小时)。在αIFN注射后24小时,非尿毒症患者血清中就无法检测到该药物,而在所有透析患者血清中,直到下次注射时仍可检测到。在第10次注射前测量αIFN的谷浓度时,A组的10例患者谷浓度始终低于阈值水平,即4.1 pg/ml,而B组9例患者中有4例可检测到(P=0.05),范围在5.8至36.1 pg/ml之间。仅在B组观察到严重的神经副作用,即3例患者。血红蛋白水平确实显著下降,但仅在B组患者中出现,且这与Cmax显著相关(r=0.67;P=0.03)。这是第一项对照研究,证明透析患者中αIFN的清除率约为非尿毒症患者的一半。这些结果在为肾功能正常或接受慢性血液透析的HCV+患者确定最佳αIFN治疗方案时可能具有参考价值。