Suppr超能文献

双侧矢状劈开截骨术后评估神经感觉障碍的不同测试方法比较

Comparison of different tests assessing neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

作者信息

Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Dec;27(6):417-21. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(98)80028-3.

Abstract

Different methods of assessing functional impairment of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split osteotomy were compared with subjective reports. Thirty patients were tested preoperatively as well as after four days, three weeks, three months, six months, and one year of follow up. All the patients underwent bilateral mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy. The sensation of the mandibular teeth was assessed by an electric vitality scanner. Other neurosensory assessments included light touch, two-point discrimination, tactile discrimination, and thermal discrimination. It was shown that electric sensibility-testing of mandibular teeth is a useful method for evaluating neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy, and it correlated even better with the patient's subjective evaluation than the other tests used in this study.

摘要

将矢状劈开截骨术后下牙槽神经功能损害的不同评估方法与主观报告进行了比较。对30例患者在术前以及随访4天、3周、3个月、6个月和1年后进行了测试。所有患者均接受双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术。通过电子活力扫描仪评估下颌牙齿的感觉。其他神经感觉评估包括轻触觉、两点辨别觉、触觉辨别觉和温度辨别觉。结果表明,下颌牙齿的电感觉测试是评估矢状劈开截骨术后神经感觉障碍的一种有用方法,并且与本研究中使用的其他测试相比,它与患者的主观评估相关性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验