Suppr超能文献

笼内光照条件对电击诱发打斗的影响。

Influence of home-cage lighting conditions on shock-induced fighting.

作者信息

Knutson J F, Hynan M T, Kane N L

出版信息

J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1976 Sep;90(9):877-88. doi: 10.1037/h0077273.

Abstract

A series of experiments was conducted to assess the influence of home-cage lighting conditions on shock-induced aggression in rats. The first two experiments tested rats six times within 24 hr and demonstrated that subjects maintained on a light/dark (LD) cycle fought more than rats maintained on a 24-hr light schedule (LL). In addition, a periodic trend could be identified in the data of the LD groups but not in the data of the LL groups. The second two experiments assessed the effects of castration on this lighting effect. Castration of adults did not influence the lighting effects, but castration of weanling rats eliminated the group difference between LL and LD groups. However, the LD rats castrated at weaning did show the periodic trend characteristic of all of the LD groups tested within 24 hr. Two additional experiments assessed the effects of time of testing in between-subjects designs. Time of testing was a significant variable in the LD groups but unimportant in the LL groups. A final experiment demonstrated that the difference between the LD and LL groups does not emerge in a daily testing procedure.

摘要

进行了一系列实验,以评估笼内光照条件对大鼠电击诱导攻击行为的影响。前两个实验在24小时内对大鼠进行了六次测试,结果表明,处于明暗(LD)循环的实验对象比处于24小时光照时间表(LL)的大鼠打架更多。此外,在LD组的数据中可以识别出周期性趋势,而在LL组的数据中则没有。后两个实验评估了去势对这种光照效应的影响。成年大鼠去势不影响光照效应,但断奶大鼠去势消除了LL组和LD组之间的组间差异。然而,断奶时去势的LD大鼠在24小时内确实表现出了所有测试的LD组所特有的周期性趋势。另外两个实验评估了组间设计中测试时间的影响。测试时间在LD组中是一个显著变量,但在LL组中并不重要。最后一个实验表明,LD组和LL组之间的差异在每日测试程序中并未出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验