Suppr超能文献

[仔猪安乐死:气体法还是注射法?]

[Euthanasia of piglets: gas or injection?].

作者信息

Baumans V, Meijer J C, Haberham Z L, de Groot H N, Hellebrekers L J

机构信息

Vakgroep Proefdierkunde, Faculteit der Diergeneeskunde, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus.

出版信息

Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1998 Dec 15;123(24):738-42.

PMID:9879622
Abstract

Methods for the humane killing of animals are watched critically by both the public and the veterinary community. Evaluation of such methods requires assessment of efficacy as well as emotional and ethical aspects. Rapidity of loss of consciousness is a crucial factor in such evaluations. In the present study, four methods for piglet euthanasia were compared with regard to presence of indicators of discomfort (pain, anxiety, stress) and rapidity of onset of death, defined as the absence of breathing, heart beats and reflexes, combined with isoelectricity of the electro-encephalogram (EEG). The study was performed on piglets, which had to be destroyed on account of preventive measures against swine fever. The following methods were applied: CO2 98%, CO2/O2 65/35%, T61 and pentobarbital (Euthesate) injected intracardially. Intracardial injections of T61 and pentobarbital provide fast unconsciousness and death with minimal discomfort to the animal.

摘要

动物人道处死的方法受到公众和兽医界的严格关注。对这些方法的评估需要考量其有效性以及情感和伦理方面。意识丧失的速度是此类评估的关键因素。在本研究中,比较了四种仔猪安乐死方法在不适指标(疼痛、焦虑、应激)的存在情况以及死亡起始速度方面的差异,死亡定义为呼吸、心跳和反射消失,同时脑电图呈等电位。该研究在因预防猪瘟而必须扑杀的仔猪身上进行。采用了以下方法:98%二氧化碳、65/35%二氧化碳/氧气、T61以及心内注射戊巴比妥(安乐死注射液)。心内注射T61和戊巴比妥可使动物快速失去意识并死亡,且不适程度降至最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验