Milette P C, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, Cardinal E, Breton G
Department of Radiology, Hôpital Saint-Luc, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jan 1;24(1):44-53. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199901010-00011.
Independent evaluation by two observers of 132 lumbar discs in 45 patients with chronic low back pain investigated by both magnetic resonance imaging and discography.
To assess some of the fundamental differences between lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.
Moderate interobserver agreement has been reported when the morphologic terms normal, bulge, protrusion, and extrusion are used. The validity of this nomenclature remains unknown.
Discs were evaluated on magnetic resonance images for central and peripheral signal characteristics, height, contour, and nerve root compression. Discograms were classified according to degrees of disc degeneration, disruption, and pain reproduction.
Loss of intervertebral height or abnormal signal intensity on magnetic resonance imagery was significantly associated with disc disruptions extending into or beyond the outer anulus on discograms. All 23 protrusions (100%) and 12 of 15 disc bulges (80%) were associated with Stage 2 or 3 anular disruptions and, in most instances, similar or exact reproduction of pain during disc injection. There was no significant difference between disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal, with respect to degree of disc degeneration, extent of disruptions, or presence of discogenic pain.
In patients with chronic low back pain, loss of disc height or abnormal signal intensity is highly predictive of symptomatic tears extending into or beyond the outer anulus. Disc bulges and disc protrusions do not represent discs with significantly different internal architecture, based on the findings of discography, and are no more suggestive of symptomatic tears than discs showing normal contour but decreased height or abnormal signal intensity.
由两名观察者对45例慢性下腰痛患者的132个腰椎间盘进行独立评估,这些患者均接受了磁共振成像和椎间盘造影检查。
评估腰椎间盘突出、椎间盘膨出以及在T2加权磁共振图像上轮廓正常但信号强度异常的椎间盘之间的一些基本差异。
当使用形态学术语正常、膨出、突出和脱出时,观察者间的一致性为中等。这种命名法的有效性仍然未知。
在磁共振图像上评估椎间盘的中央和外周信号特征、高度、轮廓以及神经根受压情况。根据椎间盘退变、破裂和疼痛再现的程度对椎间盘造影进行分类。
磁共振成像上椎间盘高度丢失或信号强度异常与椎间盘造影中延伸至外层纤维环或超出外层纤维环的椎间盘破裂显著相关。所有23个突出(100%)和15个膨出中的12个(80%)与2期或3期纤维环破裂相关,并且在大多数情况下,椎间盘注射时疼痛类似或完全再现。在椎间盘退变程度、破裂范围或椎间盘源性疼痛的存在方面,椎间盘突出、椎间盘膨出以及轮廓正常但信号异常的椎间盘之间没有显著差异。
在慢性下腰痛患者中,椎间盘高度丢失或信号强度异常高度预示着症状性撕裂延伸至外层纤维环或超出外层纤维环。根据椎间盘造影的结果,椎间盘膨出和椎间盘突出并不代表内部结构有显著差异的椎间盘,并且与轮廓正常但高度降低或信号异常的椎间盘相比,它们并不更提示有症状性撕裂。