Mantovani G, Ghiani M, Curreli L, Maccio A, Massa D, Succu G, Lai P, Massa E, Mudu M C, Astara G
Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Oncol Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):421-6. doi: 10.3892/or.6.2.421.
Despite the numerous studies demonstrating the effectiveness of epoetin á (human recombinant erythropoietin) versus placebo in cisplatin-induced anemia of cancer patients, data are lacking on the most effective doses and schedules of administration of epoetin á in this setting. The aim of the present study was to assess the best dose and schedule of administration of epoetin á in cancer patients with cisplatin-induced anemia. This was an open, randomized, single-institution phase II study comparing the ability of two doses and schedules of epoetin á of preventing and/or correcting anemia, measured as the increase in hemoglobin level and decrease in transfusion requirements, in 20 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced stage head and neck, esophageal, and lung cancer, treated with cisplatin at doses 80 mg/m2. The secondary endpoint of the study was to assess the serum levels of certain cytokines involved in cancer anorexia/cachexia syndrome. The eligible patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either: a) subcutaneous epoetin á 150 U/kg three times a week for up to 12 consecutive weeks (Group A); b) subcutaneous epoetin á 50 U/kg daily for up to 12 consecutive weeks (Group B). The following laboratory parameters were assessed before the study entry and during the study: hemoglobin (weekly); serum iron, transferrin and ferritin (before entry). The following immunological parameters were assessed before and after study end: Interleukin (IL)-1á, IL-1 , IL-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) á. Twenty patients were enrolled, data were available for 17. Nine patients were assigned to Group A and 8 to Group B. No statistically significant difference of hemoglobin level was found between the 2 groups at baseline, at month 1, 2 and 3, neither in the comparison of the change from baseline between the two groups. In Group A fewer transfusions were administered per patient per month after the first month of epoetin á therapy, compared to Group B. No significant difference was found as for transfusion requirements at month 1, 2 and 3 between Group A and B. The epoetin á dose administered was slightly higher than that projected. Epoetin á was well-tolerated. There was no statistically significant correlation between change in hemoglobin level and tumor response for either group, neither between change in hemoglobin level and change in ECOG score from baseline to final was observed. The changes from baseline of IL-1á and IL-1 , IL-6 and TNFá were not remarkable nor univocal in either group, there was not correlation between hemoglobin change and serum cytokine changes from baseline, except for IL-6 in Group A.
尽管众多研究表明促红细胞生成素α(重组人促红细胞生成素)相较于安慰剂,在治疗顺铂所致癌症患者贫血方面疗效显著,但关于促红细胞生成素α在此种情况下的最有效剂量及给药方案的数据仍较为匮乏。本研究旨在评估促红细胞生成素α在顺铂所致贫血癌症患者中的最佳剂量及给药方案。这是一项开放、随机、单机构的II期研究,比较了两种剂量及给药方案的促红细胞生成素α对20例初治的晚期头颈癌、食管癌和肺癌患者预防和/或纠正贫血的能力,这些患者接受80mg/m²剂量的顺铂治疗,贫血的评估指标为血红蛋白水平的升高和输血需求的降低。该研究的次要终点是评估某些参与癌症厌食/恶病质综合征的细胞因子的血清水平。符合条件的患者被随机分配接受以下治疗之一:a)皮下注射促红细胞生成素α 150U/kg,每周3次,连续12周(A组);b)皮下注射促红细胞生成素α 50U/kg,每日1次,连续12周(B组)。在研究入组前及研究期间评估以下实验室参数:血红蛋白(每周);血清铁、转铁蛋白和铁蛋白(入组前)。在研究结束前后评估以下免疫参数:白细胞介素(IL)-1α、IL-1β、IL-6和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)α。共纳入20例患者,17例患者有可用数据。9例患者被分配至A组,8例患者被分配至B组。两组在基线、第1、2和3个月时血红蛋白水平无统计学显著差异,两组间从基线变化的比较也无显著差异。在促红细胞生成素α治疗的第1个月后,A组每位患者每月的输血次数少于B组。A组和B组在第1、2和3个月时的输血需求无显著差异。促红细胞生成素α的给药剂量略高于预期。促红细胞生成素α耐受性良好。两组中血红蛋白水平变化与肿瘤反应之间均无统计学显著相关性,从基线到最终的血红蛋白水平变化与东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分变化之间也未观察到相关性。两组中IL-1α和IL-1β、IL-6和TNFα从基线的变化均不显著且不明确,除A组中的IL-6外,血红蛋白变化与血清细胞因子从基线的变化之间无相关性。