Suppr超能文献

多项选择题考试:采用基于证据的考试技巧方法。

Multiple-choice examinations: adopting an evidence-based approach to exam technique.

作者信息

Hammond E J, McIndoe A K, Sansome A J, Spargo P M

机构信息

Shackleton Department of Anaesthesia, Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1998 Nov;53(11):1105-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00583.x.

Abstract

Negatively marked multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are part of the assessment process in both the Primary and Final examinations for the fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. It is said that candidates who guess will lose marks in the MCQ paper. We studied candidates attending a pre-examination revision course and have shown that an evaluation of examination technique is an important part of an individual's preparation. All candidates benefited substantially from backing their educated guesses while only 3 out of 27 lost marks from backing their wild guesses. Failure to appreciate the relationship between knowledge and technique may significantly affect a candidate's performance in the examination.

摘要

带有负评分的多项选择题是皇家麻醉师学院初级和期末考试评估过程的一部分。据说在多项选择题考试中,靠猜测答题的考生会丢分。我们对参加考前复习课程的考生进行了研究,结果表明,评估考试技巧是个人备考的重要组成部分。所有考生通过支持有根据的猜测都大幅受益,而在27名考生中只有3人因支持胡乱猜测而丢分。未能认识到知识与技巧之间的关系可能会显著影响考生在考试中的表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验