Suzuki F, Nakajima M, Matsuda M, Tanaka T, Matsumura K, Koyama T
Department of Neurosurgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Ohtsu, Japan.
No Shinkei Geka. 1999 Jan;27(1):95-100.
Two cases of axis fracture are reported. Traffic accidents were the cause of injury in both cases. The odontoid process was dislocated anterolaterally with fracture of the lateral mass of the axis in both cases. In Case 1 good alignment of the atlas and axis could not be maintained even with a Halo-vest. The case 2 patient with spinal cord compression caused by dislocation of the axis was referred to our hospital 8 weeks after the accident. Both cases were surgically treated in a similar fashion. Because of the lateral mass fracture and lateral displacement of the atlas relative to the axis, posterior screw fixation with interlaminar fixation (Magerl) was thought to carry a risk of causing damage to the vertebral artery. Because of this, anterior screw fixation combined with posterior wiring was conducted. First, the odontoid process was fixed anteriorly by a screw because it was able to be placed back in good alignment while the patient was in the supine position. Then, the posterior C1-2 interlaminar wiring with iliac bone graft was added. Rigid fixation was obtained without any complication. Various kinds of fixation, such as posterior interlaminar wiring, odontoid screw fixation and Magerl's fixation, have been reported for the treatment of unstable axis fracture. Among them Magerl's method has been regarded as the most stable. When it is not applicable, combination of the first two methods can be an alternative way of treatment for this odontoid process fracture.
报告了两例枢椎骨折病例。两例均因交通事故受伤。两例患者齿突均向前外侧脱位并伴有枢椎侧块骨折。病例1即使使用头环背心也无法维持寰椎和枢椎的良好对线。病例2患者因枢椎脱位导致脊髓受压,在事故发生8周后被转诊至我院。两例均采用类似方式进行手术治疗。由于侧块骨折以及寰椎相对于枢椎的侧方移位,认为采用后路螺钉固定联合椎板间固定(马格勒法)有损伤椎动脉的风险。因此,采用前路螺钉固定联合后路钢丝固定。首先,由于在患者仰卧位时齿突能够恢复良好对线,故用螺钉从前路固定齿突。然后,增加后路C1-2椎板间钢丝固定并植骨。获得了牢固固定且无任何并发症。已有多种固定方法用于治疗不稳定的枢椎骨折,如后路椎板间钢丝固定、齿突螺钉固定和马格勒固定等。其中,马格勒法被认为是最稳定的。当该方法不适用时,前两种方法联合使用可作为治疗此类齿突骨折的替代方法。