Gidron Y, Gal R, Zahavi S
Department of Sociology of Health, Ben-Gurion University of The Negev, Israel.
J Trauma Stress. 1999 Jan;12(1):185-92. doi: 10.1023/A:1024762819880.
This study examined the use of three coping strategies: (1) emotion-focused coping (calming-distraction); (2) problem-focused coping (checking-behavior); and (3) denial (reduced perceived vulnerability), and their relationship to anxiety from terrorism among 50 Israeli bus commuters. Their mean age was 31 years (60% females). Commuting frequency was negatively correlated, and problem-focused coping was positively correlated with anxiety from terrorism. Ratios of problem-focused coping/denial and of problem-focused/emotion-focused coping were each positively correlated with anxiety from terrorism. Coping ratios accounted for 15% of the variance in anxiety from terrorism, after considering commuting frequency. Combining minimal problem-focused preventative acts with distraction and reduced perceived vulnerability may be beneficial.
（1）以情绪为中心的应对方式（平静分心）；（2）以问题为中心的应对方式（检查行为）；以及（3）否认（降低感知到的脆弱性），并研究了它们与50名以色列公交通勤者因恐怖主义产生的焦虑之间的关系。他们的平均年龄为31岁（60%为女性）。通勤频率呈负相关，以问题为中心的应对方式与因恐怖主义产生的焦虑呈正相关。以问题为中心的应对方式/否认的比率以及以问题为中心的应对方式/以情绪为中心的应对方式的比率均与因恐怖主义产生的焦虑呈正相关。在考虑通勤频率后，应对比率解释了因恐怖主义产生的焦虑中15%的方差。将最少的以问题为中心的预防行为与分心和降低感知到的脆弱性相结合可能会有益。
