Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术与前部分胃底折叠术的前瞻性随机双盲试验。

Prospective randomized double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication.

作者信息

Watson D I, Jamieson G G, Pike G K, Davies N, Richardson M, Devitt P G

机构信息

The Royal Adelaide Centre for Endoscopic Surgery and University Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1999 Jan;86(1):123-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00969.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the operative management of gastro-oesophageal reflux, a balance must be achieved between adequate control of reflux and excessive dysphagia. The ideal technique is not known. A randomized study was performed to determine whether laparoscopic anterior fundoplication is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, while achieving equivalent control of reflux.

METHODS

Patients presenting for laparoscopic antireflux surgery were randomized to undergo either a Nissen fundoplication (n = 53) or an anterior 180 degrees hemifundoplication (n = 54). Patients were blinded to which procedure had been performed, and follow-up was obtained by a blinded independent investigator. Standardized clinical grading systems were used to assess dysphagia, heartburn and patient satisfaction 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. Objective measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal emptying time, distal oesophageal acid exposure and endoscopic healing of oesophagitis was also performed.

RESULTS

Operating time was similar for the two procedures (58 min for the Nissen procedure versus 60 min for anterior fundoplication). Resting and residual lower oesophageal sphincter pressures were lower following anterior fundoplication (29 versus 18 mmHg, and 13 versus 6 mmHg), and oesophageal emptying times were faster (92 versus 116 s). Acid exposure times and ability to heal oesophagitis were similar. At 3 months' follow-up clinical outcomes were similar for the two procedures. At 6 months, however, patients who had undergone anterior fundoplication experienced significantly less dysphagia for solid food and were more likely to be satisfied with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic anterior fundoplication achieved equivalent control of reflux, more physiological postoperative manometry parameters, and an improved clinical outcome at 6 months. Continued follow-up remains necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of the partial fundoplication procedure.

摘要

背景

在胃食管反流的手术治疗中,必须在充分控制反流与过度吞咽困难之间取得平衡。理想的技术尚不清楚。进行了一项随机研究,以确定腹腔镜前位胃底折叠术与腹腔镜nissen胃底折叠术相比,在实现同等反流控制的情况下,术后吞咽困难的发生率是否更低。

方法

接受腹腔镜抗反流手术的患者被随机分为接受nissen胃底折叠术(n = 53)或前位180度半胃底折叠术(n = 54)。患者对所进行的手术不知情,由一位不知情的独立研究者进行随访。采用标准化临床分级系统在术后1、3和6个月评估吞咽困难、烧心和患者满意度。还对食管下括约肌压力、食管排空时间、食管远端酸暴露情况以及食管炎的内镜愈合情况进行了客观测量。

结果

两种手术的手术时间相似(nissen手术为58分钟,前位胃底折叠术为60分钟)。前位胃底折叠术后静息和残余食管下括约肌压力较低(分别为29 mmHg对18 mmHg,13 mmHg对6 mmHg),食管排空时间更快(92秒对116秒)。酸暴露时间和食管炎愈合能力相似。在3个月的随访中,两种手术的临床结果相似。然而,在6个月时,接受前位胃底折叠术的患者固体食物吞咽困难明显较少,对临床结果更满意。

结论

腹腔镜前位胃底折叠术实现了同等的反流控制,术后测压参数更符合生理,且在6个月时临床结果有所改善。仍需持续随访以确认部分胃底折叠术的长期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验