• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative efficacy and safety of albuterol sulfate Spiros inhaler and albuterol metered-dose inhaler in asthma.

作者信息

Nelson H, Kemp J P, Bieler S, Vaughan L M, Hill M R

机构信息

National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO 80206, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):329-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.329.

DOI:10.1378/chest.115.2.329
PMID:10027428
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of albuterol administration using a Spiros Inhalation System (Dura Pharmaceuticals; San Diego, CA) dry powder inhaler (DPI) and albuterol (Ventolin; Glaxo Wellcome; Research Triangle Park, NC) administration using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in patients with asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 283 adolescent and adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. The patients were randomized into one of three treatment groups: the Spiros group, who were given 108 microg/actuation of albuterol sulfate equivalent to 90 microg of albuterol base; the MDI group, who were given 90 microg/actuation of albuterol; and the placebo group.

RESULTS

Over the length of the study, the Spiros and MDI groups were comparable in all FEV1 parameters. Both active treatment groups were superior to the placebo group for each FEV1 parameter at all visits. With the exception of differences at treatment week 0 for the maximum percent change in the FEV1, the duration of effect, and the area under the curve at baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the Spiros and MDI groups for any FEV1 parameters. Using a repeated-measures analysis, the FEV1 parameters at week 0 for the Spiros group were not statistically significantly different from the parameters at weeks 4, 8, and 12. The same analysis effect at week 0 for the MDI group was greater for maximum percent change in the FEV1 from baseline (weeks 4, 8, and 12) and duration of effect. Adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECG results, and physical examinations were reported with similar incidence in each of the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Both active treatments were superior to the placebo treatment. The Spiros DPI was well tolerated and was as effective as the albuterol MDI in treating patients with moderate asthma.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of albuterol sulfate Spiros inhaler and albuterol metered-dose inhaler in asthma.
Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):329-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.329.
2
Clinical comparability of albuterol delivered by the breath-actuated inhaler (Spiros) and albuterol by MDI in patients with asthma.哮喘患者中,呼吸驱动吸入器(Spiros)递送的沙丁胺醇与定量吸入器递送的沙丁胺醇的临床可比性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Apr;82(4):377-82. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63287-5.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol administered twice daily via hydrofluoroalkane 134a metered-dose inhaler in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗通过氢氟烷烃134a定量吸入器每日两次给药在青少年和成年持续性哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的12周研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.008.
4
Formoterol delivered via the dry powder Aerolizer inhaler versus albuterol MDI and placebo in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial.通过干粉吸入器Aerolizer吸入福莫特罗与使用沙丁胺醇定量气雾剂及安慰剂治疗轻至中度哮喘的随机双盲双模拟试验。
J Asthma. 2003;40(5):505-14. doi: 10.1081/jas-120018780.
5
Efficacy, tolerability, and effect on asthma-related quality of life of formoterol bid via multidose dry powder inhaler and albuterol QID via metered dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.多剂量干粉吸入器吸入福莫特罗一日两次与定量气雾剂吸入沙丁胺醇一日四次对持续性哮喘患者的疗效、耐受性及哮喘相关生活质量的影响:一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照的平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1587-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.004.
6
Pilot study of bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol delivered by metered-dose inhaler and a novel dry powder inhaler.定量气雾剂和新型干粉吸入器吸入沙丁胺醇后支气管扩张反应的初步研究
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Oct;79(4):322-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63022-0.
7
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of Albuterol (Salbuterol) Multi-dose Dry-Powder Inhaler and ProAir(®) Hydrofluoroalkane for the Treatment of Persistent Asthma: Results of Two Randomized Double-Blind Studies.沙丁胺醇多剂量干粉吸入器与普米克令舒(ProAir®)氢氟烷烃治疗持续性哮喘的药代动力学、药效学、疗效及安全性:两项随机双盲研究结果
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Jan;36(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s40261-015-0346-y.
8
Therapeutic equivalence of Spiros dry powder inhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler. A bioassay using methacholine.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;160(4):1238-43. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9806101.
9
Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol compared with albuterol in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a randomized controlled trial.异丙托溴铵/沙丁胺醇与沙丁胺醇治疗中重度哮喘患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Apr 30;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0223-3.
10
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety outcomes of salbutamol: A systematic review and meta-analysis.沙丁胺醇的安全性结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Respir J. 2023 Dec;17(12):1254-1264. doi: 10.1111/crj.13711. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
The future of dry powder inhaled therapy: Promising or discouraging for systemic disorders?干粉吸入疗法的未来:对全身疾病是有希望还是令人沮丧?
Int J Pharm. 2022 Feb 25;614:121457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121457. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma.
压力定量吸入器与所有其他手持吸入装置用于非急性哮喘患者递送β-2激动剂支气管扩张剂的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002158.
4
Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta (2 )agonists bronchodilators in asthma.压力定量吸入器与其他手持吸入装置在哮喘中递送β₂激动剂支气管扩张剂的临床有效性的系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):901-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7318.901.
5
Discriminating measures of bronchodilator drug efficacy and potency.支气管扩张剂药物疗效和效能的鉴别指标。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):245-53. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01450.x.
6
Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in asthma: regular vs as needed treatment.吸入性短效β2受体激动剂在哮喘治疗中的应用:规律治疗与按需治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2003(4):CD001285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001285.