Suppr超能文献

医护人员对醛类的职业性过敏。临床观察。实验。

Occupational allergy to aldehydes in health care workers. Clinical observations. Experiments.

作者信息

Kieć-Swierczyńska M, Krecisz B, Krysiak B, Kuchowicz E, Rydzyński K

机构信息

Occupational Health Out-patient Clinic, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lódź, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(4):349-58.

Abstract

The incidence of allergy to aldehydes (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, glyoxal) was examined in 280 health care workers suffering from skin lesions. Allergy was diagnosed in 64 (22.8%) patients. The majority of them (85.9%) were sensitive only to 1 aldehyde. Formaldehyde caused allergy slightly more frequently (13.9%) than glutaraldehyde (12.4%). Only 5 (1.9%) patients were sensitive to glyoxal. The irritant effect of aldehydes to the rabbit eye and skin was tested by the Draize and OECD methods. Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde showed stronger irritant effect than glyoxal. The sensitizing activity of aldehydes was also confirmed in guinea pigs (using the Maximization Test and the OECD methods). Formaldehyde showed the strongest and most persistent reactions. Significantly higher eosinophil and basophil counts were found in the blood samples of the sensitized guinea pigs. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde and glyoxal was tested on mouse 3T3-L1 fibroblasts by the Neutral Red Uptake and MTT Reduction Assay. It was shown that both aldehydes were cytotoxic, and that the cytotoxic effect of glutaraldehyde was stronger than that of glyoxal.

摘要

对280名患有皮肤损伤的医护人员进行了醛类(甲醛、戊二醛、乙二醛)过敏发生率的检查。64名(22.8%)患者被诊断为过敏。其中大多数人(85.9%)仅对1种醛敏感。甲醛引起过敏的频率(13.9%)略高于戊二醛(12.4%)。只有5名(1.9%)患者对乙二醛敏感。采用Draize和经合组织方法测试了醛类对兔眼和皮肤的刺激作用。甲醛和戊二醛的刺激作用比乙二醛更强。醛类的致敏活性在豚鼠中也得到了证实(采用最大化试验和经合组织方法)。甲醛表现出最强和最持久的反应。在致敏豚鼠的血液样本中发现嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计数显著更高。采用中性红摄取和MTT还原试验在小鼠3T3-L1成纤维细胞上测试了戊二醛和乙二醛的细胞毒性。结果表明,两种醛都具有细胞毒性,且戊二醛的细胞毒性比乙二醛更强。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验