• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解读关于健康问题的立法投票模式:一种方法及基本原理。

Interpreting legislative voting patterns on health issues: a method and rationale.

作者信息

Kennedy V C

出版信息

J Community Health. 1976 Spring;1(3):188-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01323109.

DOI:10.1007/BF01323109
PMID:1002862
Abstract

Crucial decisions affecting the health field are increasingly being made in the political arena. To interpret and effectively influence these political events, the health specialist must become acquainted with the political decision maker's perspective on health issues. This report presents a method for analyzing legislative voting patterns to determine the issue structure within which health-related legislative decisions are made. Once this issue structure has been determined for a given legislative body, relevant strategies for influencing the decision-making process can be designed.

摘要

影响卫生领域的关键决策越来越多地在政治舞台上做出。为了解读并有效影响这些政治事件,卫生专家必须熟悉政治决策者对卫生问题的看法。本报告提出了一种分析立法投票模式的方法,以确定做出与卫生相关立法决策的问题结构。一旦为特定立法机构确定了这种问题结构,就可以设计出影响决策过程的相关策略。

相似文献

1
Interpreting legislative voting patterns on health issues: a method and rationale.解读关于健康问题的立法投票模式:一种方法及基本原理。
J Community Health. 1976 Spring;1(3):188-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01323109.
2
Regulating health care facilities: the certificate-of-need process re-examined.
Inquiry. 1973 Sep;10(3):3-9.
3
Health planning and the U.S. federal government.
Int J Health Serv. 1972 Aug;2(3):367-76. doi: 10.2190/CMKQ-0C05-CK6U-CQJD.
4
Evaluation of national health programs. 3. A political perspective.国家卫生项目评估。3. 政治视角。
Am J Public Health. 1971 Sep;61(9):1809-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.61.9.1809.
5
Dimensions of consumer participation and national health legislation.消费者参与的维度与国家卫生立法。
Am J Public Health. 1974 Apr;64(4):357-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.64.4.357.
6
Planning for health facilities in the United States and in West Germany.美国和西德的卫生设施规划。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):41-71.
7
Regulatory and review functions of agencies created by the act.该法案所设立机构的监管及审查职能。
Public Health Rep. 1976 Jan-Feb;91(1):24-8.
8
OMB the secrets of the secret agency.美国管理和预算办公室知晓该秘密机构的秘密。 (注:原英文表述不太准确规范,正常应该是“OMB knows the secrets of the secret agency.” 按照字面严格翻译就是这样,感觉原句表意不太清晰完整)
Mod Healthc (Short Term Care). 1975 Sep;4(3):23-7.
9
Provisions of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act.《国家卫生规划与资源开发法》的规定
Hosp Prog. 1975 Apr;56(4):48-50/80.
10
Feds defend AIDS policy as HIV rate increases among women worldwide.随着全球女性艾滋病毒感染率上升,联邦政府为艾滋病政策进行辩护。
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst. 1992 Jul 29(12):3-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The political ingredient of public health services. A neglected area of research.公共卫生服务的政治因素。一个被忽视的研究领域。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Oct;44(4):13-34.
2
The politics of health planning. I. Introduction.卫生规划的政治学。一、引言。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1969 May;59(5):795-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.59.5.795.
3
Public health--inside or outside the mainstream of the political process? Lessons from the passage of Medicaid.公共卫生——处于政治进程的主流之内还是之外?医疗补助计划通过历程带来的启示。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1970 Sep;60(9):1690-700. doi: 10.2105/ajph.60.9.1690.
4
Social policy and the health services: the choices ahead. The sixth annual Bronfman lecture.社会政策与医疗卫生服务:未来的选择。第六届年度布隆夫曼讲座
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967 Feb;57(2):199-212. doi: 10.2105/ajph.57.2.199.