• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核医学与放射学中的躯体效应。

Somatic effects in nuclear medicine and radiology.

作者信息

Overbeek F J, Pauwels E K, Bloem J L, Camps J A, Geleijns J, Broerse J J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Radiat Isot. 1999 Jan;50(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00032-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00032-3
PMID:10028628
Abstract

Probable risks for the occurrence of somatic effects due to diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine are summarised. The biological background of radiation carcinogenesis and epidemiological results are discussed. At the Leiden University Medical Centre the average effective dose per examination due to diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine amount to 0.95 and 4.4 mSv, respectively. These values correspond well with the average values of 0.82 and 3.0 mSv reported for The Netherlands as a whole. Since radiological examinations are performed at a much larger frequency than nuclear medicine the relative collective dose for the first type of examinations is higher than the latter. Risk for occurency of malignancies are at least one order of magnitude lower than the hypothetical risk due to the background radiation typical of The Netherlands.

摘要

总结了诊断放射学和核医学导致躯体效应发生的可能风险。讨论了辐射致癌的生物学背景和流行病学结果。在莱顿大学医学中心,诊断放射学和核医学每次检查的平均有效剂量分别为0.95和4.4毫希沃特。这些值与整个荷兰报告的0.82和3.0毫希沃特的平均值非常吻合。由于放射学检查的执行频率比核医学高得多,因此第一种检查类型的相对集体剂量高于后者。恶性肿瘤发生的风险至少比荷兰典型背景辐射导致的假设风险低一个数量级。

相似文献

1
Somatic effects in nuclear medicine and radiology.核医学与放射学中的躯体效应。
Appl Radiat Isot. 1999 Jan;50(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00032-3.
2
Patient doses and risks from diagnostic radiology in North-east Italy.意大利东北部诊断放射学的患者剂量与风险。
Br J Radiol. 1987 Feb;60(710):155-65. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-710-155.
3
Radiation risks associated with diagnostic radiology.与诊断放射学相关的辐射风险。
Dis Mon. 1982 Mar;28(6):1-96. doi: 10.1016/0011-5029(82)90619-8.
4
Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09).加纳医疗实践中年度全身职业辐射暴露评估(2000 - 2009年)
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 May;149(4):431-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr318. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
5
Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer.医学辐射与甲状腺癌。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 May;23(4):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.01.159. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
6
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays.诊断性X光检查导致癌症的风险。
Lancet. 2004 Jun 5;363(9424):1909-10; author reply 1910. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16373-3.
7
A somatic dose index for diagnostic radiology.
Health Phys. 1978 Nov;35(5):629-42. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197811000-00004.
8
Radiation dose and risk of patients through nuclear medical procedures in the GDR. A comparison of 1978 and 1981.德意志民主共和国核医学检查中患者的辐射剂量与风险。1978年与1981年的比较。
Eur J Nucl Med. 1984;9(5):241-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00448547.
9
The safety of X-ray examination of radioisotope scan.
JAMA. 1978 May 12;239(19):2031-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.239.19.2031.
10
The average collective equivalent dose and fatal cancer risk for radiation workers in Radiology Department at Phramongkutklao Hospital, 2004-2008.2004 - 2008年诗里拉吉医院放射科放射工作人员的平均集体当量剂量和致命癌症风险。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 May;95 Suppl 5:S96-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno.放射学和核医学检查的知情同意与风险告知:如何逃离沟通困境。
BMJ. 2004 Oct 9;329(7470):849-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7470.849.
2
Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain.用于诊断癌症相关下背痛的快速磁共振成像
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Apr;18(4):303-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20633.x.