Weiss S J, Panlilio L V
Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, D.C. 20016, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):13-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-13.
Experiment 1 demonstrated for the first time a stimulus-reinforcer interaction in pigeons trained with free-operant multiple schedules of reinforcement. Pigeons that treadle pressed in the presence of a tone-light (TL) compound for food exhibited primarily visual stimulus control on a stimulus-element test, whereas pigeons that avoided shock in TL exhibited auditory control. In Experiment 2, this selective association was blocked in pigeons pretrained with the biologically contingency-disadvantage element of the compound (i.e., tone-food or light-shock) before TL training. When this pretraining preceded compound-stimulus training, control was now auditory in pigeons that treadle pressed for food and was visual in pigeons that avoided shock. Previous attempts at blocking this selective association were unsuccessful in pigeons (LoLordo, Jacobs, & Foree, 1982) but were successful in rats (Schindler & Weiss, 1985). Experiment 2 established that selective associations can be blocked in pigeons when the procedures that were effective with rats were systematically replicated. These results further demonstrate the cross-species generality of an associative attentional mechanism involving a biological constraint on learning in species with different dominant sensory systems.
实验1首次证明了在接受自由操作多重强化程序训练的鸽子中存在刺激-强化物相互作用。在有音调-灯光(TL)复合刺激时踩踏板获取食物的鸽子,在刺激元素测试中主要表现出视觉刺激控制,而在TL复合刺激中躲避电击的鸽子则表现出听觉控制。在实验2中,在进行TL训练之前,用复合刺激中生物性条件不利元素(即音调-食物或灯光-电击)对鸽子进行预训练,这种选择性关联被阻断。当这种预训练先于复合刺激训练时,现在踩踏板获取食物的鸽子的控制是听觉性的,而躲避电击的鸽子的控制是视觉性的。之前在鸽子身上阻断这种选择性关联的尝试未成功(洛洛尔多、雅各布斯和福里,1982),但在大鼠身上成功了(辛德勒和韦斯,1985)。实验2表明,当系统地重复对大鼠有效的程序时,鸽子中的选择性关联可以被阻断。这些结果进一步证明了一种联想性注意机制的跨物种普遍性,该机制涉及对具有不同主导感觉系统的物种学习的生物限制。