Williams J K, Rowe N M, Mackool R J, Levine J P, Hollier L H, Longaker M T, Cutting C B, Grayson B H, McCarthy J G
Variety Center of Craniofacial Rehabilitation, New York University Medical Center, New York, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 1998 Nov;9(6):504-13. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199811000-00004.
The application of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery has significantly altered the treatment of congenital mandibular deficiencies. However, evaluation of results in both animal studies and clinical cases has revealed deficiencies, particularly in two areas. First, distraction using a uniplanar device in an anteroposterior direction can result in a persistent anterior open bite. Second, the lateralization of the distracted hemimandible was often limited, with insufficient incremental gain in the bigonial distance. To overcome these shortcomings, a multiplanar distraction device was developed and tested in the canine model. This report details canine studies addressing the first problem: combined anteroposterior or sagittal (z-axis) and superoinferior or vertical (y-axis) movements. Six dogs underwent bilateral mandibular distraction with an external (extraoral), multiplanar device and completed sagittal plus vertical distraction. Evaluation included clinical examination (facial form, jaw position, and occlusion), photography, cephalograms (posteroanterior, basilar, and lateral), three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions, and examination of dry skulls. The dogs averaged 18.5 mm (range, 15-20 mm) of sagittal distraction and 41.0 degrees (range, 21-50 degrees) of vertical distraction. Marked anterior open bites were produced after vertical distraction secondary to premature contact of the maxillary and mandibular molars. Distraction in the vertical direction also had the additive effect of increasing the sagittal gains by approximately 5% to 10%. In conclusion, a multiplanar distraction device (with the potential for distraction in three planes) was effective in increasing mandibular anteroposterior thrust (sagittal distraction) and also in creating an anterior open bite (vertical or superoinferior distraction). Vertical distraction probably requires bilateral osteotomies to obtain optimal results. The preliminary gains in sagittal length are modified (reduced or increased) after distraction in a second plane (vertical and horizontal). Specifically, vertical distraction in the inferior direction (creating an open bite) also leads to isolated increases in the anteroposterior plane. Conversely, vertical distraction in the superior direction (closing an open bite), as seen in a human malocclusion, may lead to isolated decreases in the anteroposterior plane, but this question remains to be investigated in the laboratory.
牵张成骨技术在颅面外科手术中的应用显著改变了先天性下颌骨发育不全的治疗方式。然而,动物研究和临床病例的结果评估均显示存在不足之处,尤其是在两个方面。首先,使用单平面装置在前后方向进行牵张可能导致持续性前牙开颌。其次,牵张半侧下颌骨的侧向移位通常受限,下颌角间距的增加量不足。为克服这些缺点,研发了一种多平面牵张装置并在犬模型中进行了测试。本报告详细介绍了针对第一个问题的犬类研究:联合前后向或矢状向(z轴)以及上下向或垂直向(y轴)移动。六只犬使用外部(口外)多平面装置进行双侧下颌骨牵张,并完成矢状向加垂直向牵张。评估包括临床检查(面部形态、颌骨位置和咬合)、摄影、头颅侧位片(后前位、基底位和侧位)、三维计算机断层扫描重建以及干颅骨检查。犬的矢状向牵张平均为18.5毫米(范围为15 - 20毫米),垂直向牵张平均为41.0度(范围为21 - 50度)。垂直向牵张后,由于上颌和下颌磨牙过早接触,产生了明显的前牙开颌。垂直方向的牵张还具有将矢状向增加量提高约5%至10%的累加效应。总之,一种多平面牵张装置(具有在三个平面进行牵张的潜力)在增加下颌骨前后向推力(矢状向牵张)以及形成前牙开颌(垂直向或上下向牵张)方面是有效的。垂直向牵张可能需要双侧截骨以获得最佳效果。在第二个平面(垂直和水平)牵张后,矢状长度的初步增加量会发生改变(减少或增加)。具体而言,向下的垂直向牵张(形成开颌)也会导致前后平面的孤立增加。相反,如人类错颌畸形中所见的向上垂直向牵张(关闭开颌)可能会导致前后平面的孤立减少,但这个问题仍有待在实验室中进行研究。