Schwartz S H, Gottlieb A
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 Dec;34(6):1188-99. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.34.6.1188.
Seventy-two male Israeli students were exposed to a violent crime in the course of a bogus discussion. Their awareness of other bystanders' lack of reaction to the emergency (social influence) and others' awareness of their actions (evaluation apprehension) were crossed in a 2 X 2 factorial design. An "alone" condition in which the subject was the only bystander controlled for the effects of others' mere presence (diffusion of responsibility). Helping was reduced by diffusion of responsibility and slowed by negative social influence but was increased by evaluation apprehension. Differences traceable to social influence appeared prior to those from the other processes. Implications of these findings for the measurement of helping and the interpretation of bystander decision making are discussed.
72名以色列男学生在一场虚假讨论过程中接触到一起暴力犯罪事件。他们对其他旁观者对紧急情况缺乏反应(社会影响)的认知与其他人对他们行为的认知(评价忧虑)在一个2×2析因设计中相互交叉。设置了一个“单独”条件,即受试者是唯一的旁观者,以此来控制他人单纯在场的影响(责任分散)。帮助行为因责任分散而减少,因负面社会影响而减缓,但因评价忧虑而增加。可归因于社会影响的差异出现在其他过程产生的差异之前。讨论了这些发现对帮助行为测量和旁观者决策解释的意义。