Monir G, Dreifus L S, Gursoy A S, Kutalek S P
Division of Cardiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 1999 Jan;32(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(99)90021-3.
Sinoatrial block (SAB) is often difficult to identify in the presence of bradycardic rhythms. This study demonstrates several manifestations of so-called escape capture bigeminy in 14 patients. Although periods of 1:1 sinoatrial conduction can aid in the analysis of SAB, the electrocardiographic pattern of bigeminal rhythm may be the only electrocardiographic clue of SAB. In one case, both sinoatrial entrance and exit block were identified. In eight instances, digitalis or digitalis plus a beta or calcium blocking agent could be partially implicated as the cause of SAB. In 6 of 14 patients, a permanent pacemaker was required to correct the bradycardia, in spite of discontinuation of aggravating antiarrhythmic agents or electrolyte derangement.
在存在心动过缓节律的情况下,窦房阻滞(SAB)往往难以识别。本研究展示了14例患者中所谓逸搏夺获二联律的几种表现。虽然1:1窦房传导期有助于SAB的分析,但二联律的心电图模式可能是SAB的唯一心电图线索。在1例患者中,同时识别出了窦房入口和出口阻滞。在8例患者中,洋地黄或洋地黄加β受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂可能部分导致了SAB。在14例患者中的6例,尽管停用了加重心律失常的药物或纠正了电解质紊乱,但仍需要植入永久性起搏器来纠正心动过缓。