Suppr超能文献

仅用于大体检查且无需送检的外科病理标本:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对413家机构现行政策的研究

Surgical pathology specimens for gross examination only and exempt from submission: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of current policies in 413 institutions.

作者信息

Zarbo R J, Nakhleh R E

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich 48202, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999 Feb;123(2):133-9. doi: 10.5858/1999-123-0133-SPSFGE.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only.

DESIGN AND SETTING

In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement program completed a checklist of 115 proffered specimens. Also included was a questionnaire defining demographic, practice, and reimbursement variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number and types of specimens exempt from submission and submitted for gross examination only based on written institutional policy rather than on unapproved actual practices.

RESULTS

Most institutions had a written policy for types of specimens deemed exempt from submission to pathology (87.1 %) and for types of specimens subject to gross examination only (76.6%). There was a wide range of numbers of specimen types with a median number of 17 (range, 2-40) in the exempt category and 29 (range, 6-57) in the category of gross examination only. Significantly higher absolute counts of specimens exempt from submission to pathology were reported by institutions with a greater surgical pathology volume in 1996 and by nonteaching institutions. No aspect of practice was associated with numbers of specimens for gross examination only.

CONCLUSIONS

This Q-Probes study creates a multi-institutional reference database of current practices to assist pathologists and clinical staff in the development of written guidelines pertaining to surgical pathology specimen submission exceptions and gross-only examinations.

摘要

目的

调查当前机构书面政策中关于无需提交至实验室的手术病理标本类型以及仅需进行大体检查的标本类型的范围。

设计与背景

1997年第一季度,共有413家自愿参与的机构参加了美国病理学家学会的Q-Probes质量改进项目,这些机构完成了一份包含115种提供标本的清单。清单中还包括一份定义人口统计学、实践和报销变量的问卷。

主要观察指标

根据机构书面政策而非未经批准的实际做法,确定无需提交以及仅需进行大体检查的标本数量和类型。

结果

大多数机构针对被视为无需提交给病理科的标本类型(87.1%)以及仅需进行大体检查的标本类型(76.6%)制定了书面政策。标本类型数量范围广泛,无需提交的标本类型中位数为17种(范围为2 - 40种),仅需进行大体检查的标本类型中位数为29种(范围为6 - 57种)。1996年手术病理工作量较大的机构以及非教学机构报告的无需提交给病理科的标本绝对计数显著更高。实践的任何方面与仅需进行大体检查的标本数量均无关联。

结论

这项Q-Probes研究创建了一个多机构的当前实践参考数据库,以协助病理学家和临床工作人员制定有关手术病理标本提交例外情况和仅进行大体检查的书面指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验